667
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Clinical Issues

Validating the modified Rivermead Post-concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (mRPQ)

&
Pages 207-226 | Received 16 Jan 2020, Accepted 09 Jun 2021, Published online: 04 Aug 2021
 

Abstract

Objective:

Response distortions in the reporting of postconcussion symptoms can occur for many reasons. The Rivermead Post-concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) was recently modified to include an embedded symptom validity indicator to test for atypical symptoms. The present study used a simulation design to investigate the psychometric properties of the modified RPQ (mRPQ).

Method:

298 adult volunteers were randomised into three groups: honest responding (Controls, C) who reported actual, current symptoms; mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) simulators (MS) who role played being injured, and; biased mTBI simulators (BMS) who role played being injured and were asked to bias (exaggerate) their response. The MS and BMS participants received instructions to support the simulation. All participants completed the mRPQ and a modified Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (mNSI).

Results:

A 2 × 3 mixed ANOVA with one within-group variable (Symptom type: Standard or Atypical) and one between-group variable (Instruction type: C, MS, BMS) found a significant two-way interaction (p < .05, ηp2 = .08).

Conclusions:

The BMS group had score elevations for both standard and atypical postconcussion symptoms; therefore, both symptom types should be considered when evaluating for biased responding. The mRPQ has promising psychometric properties and should be further developed.

View correction statement:
Correction

Disclosure statement

The authors have no conflict of interest to report.

Notes

1 The vignettes are available on request from the corresponding author.

2 Indicative item wording shown.

Additional information

Funding

This project was approved by the QUT Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC approval number: 1900001173). The risk assessment for this project was approved by the QUT (approval number: 1331). The QUT School of Psychology and Counselling funded the gift cards for this project.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 462.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.