892
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Clinical Issues

Roles of physical activity and diet in cognitive aging: is more better?

, ORCID Icon, , , , & show all
Pages 286-303 | Received 29 Oct 2021, Accepted 28 Mar 2022, Published online: 10 Apr 2022
 

Abstract

Objective: To determine the synergistic effects of nutrition, specifically adherence to the Mediterranean-DASH Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay (MIND) diet, and physical activity on cognition and brain outcomes in a cross-sectional healthy aging cohort. Methods: A total of 132 adults (age range 52–91; Clinical Dementia Rating = 0) from the UCSF Brain Aging Project completed a 15-item MIND diet food frequency questionnaire and an 11-item self-report measure of weekly physical activity (Physical Activity Scale [PASE]). Cognitive outcomes included executive functioning, episodic memory, and language. Neuroimaging outcomes consisted of total grey matter volume and total white matter volume, adjusted for total intracranial volumes. All regression interaction models adjusted for age, sex, education, and a composite vascular burden score. Results: There was a significant interaction between PASE and MIND on executive functioning and total grey matter volume. Low levels of both related to disproportionately poorer cognitive and brain structural outcomes. Increasing levels of either, but not both, PASE or MIND related to better executive functioning and gray matter outcomes. For memory, language, and total white matter volume, the interaction between PASE and MIND showed the same directionality but did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: Higher levels of physical activity associated with better executive functioning and gray matter volume, particularly when diet was poor. Similarly, higher levels of MIND diet adherence were associated with better brain and cognitive outcomes when physical activity was low. However, highest levels of physical activity and MIND diet together did not necessarily lead to disproportionately better cognitive and brain volume outcomes.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by NIH-NIA Grants K23AG058752 and R01AG072475; the University of California San Francisco Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center under grant P30AG062422; the Alzheimer’s Association under Grant AARG-20-683875; and the Larry L. Hillblom Network under Grant 2014-A-004-NET.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 462.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.