ABSTRACT
Finnish collaborative housing projects are in an experimental stage. These projects are trying to push the conventional practices of housing production into a new shape in order to realize their schemes in the housing market dominated by large construction companies. This paper aims to shed light on the resident groups’ resources in a context where resident-driven projects are rare. We apply the concept of bricolage to analyse three collaborative housing projects in Finland. Our analysis highlights that the residents refused to enact limitations imposed by the dominant housing market and examines how this was made possible. The cases we studied were successful for two interconnected reasons: (1) because of the capabilities of the residents; and (2) the professional allies they had. We argue that analyses framed by bricolage can help better understand the local contexts with their real and presumed constraints, and offer a possibility for international comparison of collaborative housing.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Academy of Finland Strategic Research Council (Grant numbers: 303494 and 303493).
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Notes
1. Asunto-osakeyhtiö, This model, unique to Finland, literally translates as “housing joint-stock company.” Following Ruonavaara (Citation2005), we use the term housing company.
2. Carrying the legal responsibility and financial risk.