277
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Predictive factors associated with the progression of large-joint destruction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis after biologic therapy: A post-hoc analysis using FDG-PET/CT and the ARASHI (assessment of rheumatoid arthritis by scoring of large-joint destruction and healing in radiographic imaging) scoring method

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 820-827 | Received 07 Sep 2016, Accepted 25 Nov 2016, Published online: 23 Dec 2016
 

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the associations between large-joint damage and findings on fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) using the “assessment of rheumatoid arthritis by scoring of large-joint destruction and healing in radiographic imaging (ARASHI)” scoring system.

Methods: A total of 270 large joints (shoulders, elbows, hips, knees, and ankles) in 27 rheumatoid arthritis patients were assessed. FDG-PET/CT was performed at the initiation of biologics. Radiographs at baseline and at 3 years were evaluated using the ARASHI score.

Results: Radiographic progression of damage was detected in 35 by Larsen grade vs. 87 by the ARASHI score. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) at baseline, Steinbrocker stage at baseline, concomitant prednisolone use, and disease activity score in 28 joints based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) at 6 months were significantly higher in the radiographic progression group. An SUVmax higher than 1.65 at baseline was a significant predictive factor for progressive damage at 3 years.

Conclusions: The ARASHI score may allow more detailed evaluation of large joints than the Larsen method. Joint destruction is likely to have progressed at 3 years in large joints, which had a higher SUVmax at the initiation of biologics.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Yukiko Arisaka of the Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Gunma University Hospital, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan, for her contribution to the acquisition of data in this study.

Conflict of interest

None.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.