Correction

This article refers to:

Intergenerational occupational justice: Ethically reflecting on climate crisis

Article title: An intergenerational occupational justice: Ethically reflecting on climate crisis.

Authors: Drolet, M-J., Désormeaux-Moreau, M., Soubeyran, M., & Thiébaut, S.

Journal: Journal of Occupational Science

Bibliometrics: Volume 27, Number 3, pages 417 – 431

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2020.1776148

There is an error in the citation of Professor Karen Whalley Hammell's work on pages 418 - 419, and in the reference list.

The correct citations are as follows:

1. “Nussbaum's capabilities approach has been criticized (e.g., Okin, 2003; Robeyns, 2006; Sanchez, 2009) for not paying enough attention to what poor women (Okin, 2003) or people with disabilities (Hammell, 2020; Sanchez, 2009) actually say, imposing an intellectual structure on their demands.”

2. “However, many occupational scientists suggest that the capability approach should be used to design human occupational rights, some of which are based on Sen’s thinking (e.g., Bailliard, 2016; Hammell, 2017, 2020), while others refer to Nussbaum (e.g., Mousavi, Dharamsi, et al., 2015; Mousavi, Forwell, et al., 2015; Townsend, 2012). For our part, we still consider Nussbaum’s theory relevant, particularly to identify the fundamental needs of human beings and, subsequently, their basic occupational needs.”

Additional references are as follows:

Mousavi, T., Dharamsi, S., Forwell, S., & Dean, E. (2015). Occupational therapists’ views of Nussbaum’s life capability: An exploratory study. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 35(4), 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1539449215601010

Mousavi, T., Forwell, S., Dharamsi, S., & Dean, E. (2015). Do Nussbaum’s ten central human functional capabilities extend occupational therapy’s construct of occupation?: A narrative review. New Zealand Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62(1), 21–27.

Townsend, E. A. (2012). Boundaries and bridges to adult mental health: Critical occupational and capabilities perspectives of justice. Journal of Occupational Science, 19(1), 8–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2011.639723