518
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Community attitudes toward legalised gambling in Alberta

, , , , , & show all
Pages 57-79 | Published online: 31 Mar 2011
 

Abstract

Albertans representing five age cohorts (13–15, 18–20, 23–25, 43–45 and 63–65) were surveyed (n = 1809) to assess their attitudes toward gambling in general, gambling in Alberta and legal gambling's impacts in the province. Age, gender and problem gambling status were found to be reliable predictors of gambling attitudes in that younger male, non-problem gamblers were most approving of the activity. Results also indicate that Albertans are ambivalent about gambling and that gambling and public policy are mis-aligned to the extent that gambling's harms are thought to outweigh its benefits. Likely reasons for the gap between gambling policy and public opinion are that gambling issues lack the salience of ongoing high-profile topics such as the economy, health care, education and the environment, and gambling dependent special interest groups can exert considerable influence on gambling policy in ways that may not harmonise with the public interest.

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by a grant from the Alberta Gaming Research Institute. The authors also wish to thank the anonymous reviewers who provided instructive suggestions for improving the manuscript.

Notes

1. There are two similar types of legal electronic gambling machines (EGMs) in Alberta, video lottery terminals (VLTs) and slot machines. Although alike in design and function they are distinguishable primarily by location. VLT is the name given to EGMs found in premises with liquor licenses (pubs, bars and lounges), whereas slot machine is the designation used for EGMs positioned in casinos or racetracks.

2. The Nova Scotia study was completed six months ago but not released because it supposedly contained methodological flaws – flaws that were never specified. The report's non-release created a media furor centring on the supposition that the cost–benefit study must have embarrassed the government for it to have taken the drastic action of suppressing it.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 343.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.