ABSTRACT
This essay argues for the relevance of Theodor Adorno to life writing in the Anthropocene. His view of instrumental reason predicted the despoliation of the earth. His own memoir, Minima Moralia, radically decentred the individual voice by proclaiming its hopeless entanglement in exchange values. His negative dialectics reconceived Cartesian Dualism and destabilised relational models of life narration. Adorno’s view of memory contested its objectification, and his memoir includes few incidents from his life. Instead, Adorno creates dense ‘thought images’ that ponder the predicaments of living in a disastrous time. He never hid his elitism but carefully explored its limitations and hypocrisies. His pessimism alienates more hopeful sensibilities, but he never demanded allegiance to his philosophy, only a consideration of its accusations.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Notes
Chakrabarty, Dipesh, and Bruno Latour. 2021. The Climate of History in a Planetary age. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press. Biro, Andrew. 2011. Critical Ecologies: The Frankfurt School and Contemporary Environmental Crises. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Rosa, Hartmut, and Jonathan Trejo-Mathys. 2013. Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity, New Directions for Critical Theory. New York: Columbia University Press. Hayles, N. Katherine. 1999. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Haraway, Donna Jeanne. 2008. When Species Meet, Posthumanities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Holloway, Travis. 2022. How to Live at the End of the World: Theory, Art, and Politics for the Anthropocene. Stanford, California: Stanford Briefs, an imprint of Stanford University Press. Scranton, Roy. 2015. Learning to Die in the Anthropocene: Reflections on the End of a Civilization. San Franciso, CA: City Lights Books. Braidotti, Rosi. 2019. Posthuman Knowledge. Medford, MA: Polity. Ferrando, Francesca. 2019. Philosophical Posthumanism. London: Bloomsbury Academic. Richter, Gerhard. 2007. Thought-images: Frankfurt School Writers’ Reflections from Damaged Life, Cultural Memory in the Present. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. O'Connor, Brian. 2020. “Negative Dialectics and Philosophical Truth.” In A Companion to Adorno, 519–529. Pinkard, Terry. 2020. “What Is Negative Dialectics?” In A Companion to Adorno, 457–471. Oberle, Eric. 2018. Theodor Adorno and the Century of Negative Identity, Cultural Memory in the Present. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Sherman, David. 2016. “Adorno's Negative Dialectics.” Philosophy Compass 11 (7): 353–363. doi: 10.1111/phc3.12328. Earle, Bo. 2008. “Putting the Dialectic Back in Negative Dialectics: Modern Melancholia and Adornian Ethical Aesthetics New German Critique 35 (2 (104)): 33–53. doi: 10.1215/0094033x-2008-002. O'Connor, Brian. 2004. Adorno's Negative Dialectic: Philosophy and the Possibility of Critical Rationality, Studies in Contemporary German Social Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. O'Connor, Brian. 2013. Adorno, Routledge Philosophers. Abingdon, New York: Routledge. Jay, Martin. 1996. The Dialectical Imagination: A History of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research, 1923-1950, Weimar and now. Berkeley: University of California Press. Jay, Martin. 1984. Adorno. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Jay, Martin. 2002, November 28. “Speaking Azza.” London Review of Books 24: 32–34. Additional information
Notes on contributors
D. L. LeMahieu
D. L. LeMahieu is the Hotchkiss Presidential Professor at Lake Forest College, USA.
![Sample our Language & Literature journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5941/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Language-Literature.jpg"})