276
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Investigating the regional variation in rules and best management practices for forestry in New Zealand

, &
Pages 298-314 | Published online: 24 Mar 2015
 

Abstract

Under the Resource Management Act 1991 (NZ), the interpretation and implementation of environmental policy is primarily the responsibility of local government. The management of forestry operations may be influenced by statutory rules published in regional and district plans, and recommended best management practices (BMPs) published in guidelines. There are concerns that inconsistency between jurisdictions' rules have a negative impact on the forestry industry's financial and environmental outcomes. This research investigated and quantified the variation in Permitted Activity rules and BMPs, for culvert installation and earthworks, between New Zealand's 16 Regional Councils. Significant variation in these regional rules and BMPs existed in both the level of control (i.e., the number of rules and BMPs per council), and the nature of control (i.e., the proportion of rules or BMPs utilised). Further, the rules and BMPs of one council are seldom the same as another. This variation is apparent on both a national scale and when considering only neighbouring pairs of councils.

Acknowledgements

We wish to express sincere appreciation to the following people and organisations for their support, advice and assistance; Dr Elena Moltchanova, School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Canterbury; Dr Pauline Barnett, School of Health Sciences, University of Canterbury; Mr Peter Weir, New Zealand Forest Owners' Association; Mr Torrey McDonnell, Ministry for the Environment; and the numerous members of the Forestry Industry and Regional Council staff who contributed to this research.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry for Primary Industries' Sustainable Land Management and Climate Change (SLMACC) research programme (Contract FRI30584).
The underlying research materials for this article can be accessed at http://hdl.handle.net/10092/9322.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 252.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.