1,585
Views
33
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Wildlife gardening for collaborative public–private biodiversity conservation

ORCID Icon &
Pages 242-260 | Published online: 10 Apr 2017
 

ABSTRACT

Complementary public and private conservation action is required to sustain native biodiversity in cities. Residents can contribute by wildlife gardening – removing environmental weeds, cultivating indigenous flora, and improving habitat in their gardens. There is currently little guidance about how best to involve residents in wildlife gardening and align their work with public land management. We explored how a purposively chosen wildlife gardening program in Melbourne, Australia engaged and supported residents to augment local government efforts to conserve indigenous biota. Sixteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with program members to understand the program’s impact on their gardening and their connections with their council and community. Unpublished Council survey data were used to position interview findings on wildlife gardening activities and the value of program features. Interviewees detailed how they modified their gardening to assist their council to conserve indigenous biota. Five program features were implicated in this change: (1) on-site garden assessment; (2) indigenous community nursery; (3) communication hubs; (4) a framework that fosters experiential learning and community linkages; and (5) endorsement of each garden’s potential conservation contribution. Collaborative wildlife gardening programs can engage residents to manage their land to achieve landscape-focused conservation goals while building relationships with council and community.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Dr Cecily Maller for her valuable guidance and contributions to this study and manuscript, and to two anonymous reviewers whose constructive feedback has greatly improved the article. The authors sincerely thank the staff of the City of Knox, members of the Knox Environment Society, and participants in the Knox Gardens for Wildlife program who generously contributed their time and ideas for this research as interviewees.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This research was conducted with funding support from the National Environmental Science Program (NESP) and the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions [grant number CE11E0083]. LM is supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award (Australian Federal Government) and SB is supported by an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship [FT130101225].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 252.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.