Spatially varying earthquake ground motion: artificial generation and effects on earth-fill dam behavior

ABSTRACT

The observed amplitude and phase differences of seismic ground motions recorded at different locations over extended areas are termed as spatially varying earthquake ground motion (SVEGM). Earthquake-resistant design and seismic risk assessment of extended structures require three-dimensional dynamic analyses for which the excitation is needed in the form of three-directional SVEGM components, where each component needs to be consistent with the coherency model. In this paper, the principal features of the performed analyses are as follows: (1) discretisation of the spatial domain at the foundation base, (2) the selection of coherency model and (3) propagation angle of the seismic waves. In the first part of the paper, three cases for the generation of three-directional SVEGM are presented. First, the two-dimensional spatial domain, representing the foundation base of the extended structure, is discretised. Second, for case 1, the three-directional SVEGM is generated using the Liu and Hong coherency model at the cells of the grid. In this case, the loss of coherency is considered independent of the direction of the wave propagation (case general). Then, for the case 2, the two different propagation angles of 30 and 60 degrees of seismic waves and the Liu and Hong coherency model are considered. Finally, using the anisotropic coherency model of Hao et al. and the propagation angle 45 degree, the three-directional SVEGM is generated, in case 3. Results show that each component of the generated SVEGM records is affected by propagation angle and directional dependency of the coherency model. The second part of the paper is devoted to two-dimensional analyses of Marun earthfill dam and three-dimensional analyses of earthfill dams with different length-to-height ratios subjected to uniform input motion and artificially generated SVEGM.

KEYWORDS:

• SVEGM
• coherency model
• propagation angle
• three-directional earthquake ground motions

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).