Publication Cover
Tourism Geographies
An International Journal of Tourism Space, Place and Environment
Volume 18, 2016 - Issue 1
3,400
Views
49
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Homecoming or tourism? Diaspora tourism experience of second-generation immigrants

, &
Pages 59-79 | Received 17 Jun 2015, Accepted 01 Nov 2015, Published online: 15 Dec 2015
 

ABSTRACT

Diaspora tourism is often considered a form of ‘homecoming,’ but for the children of immigrants who are born in the new country, the question remains as to whether they perceive their parents’ homeland as ‘home’ or destination. Moreover, advancements in transportation and communication technologies allow contemporary immigrants to maintain transnational ties to their homeland, which in turn may affect the nature of diaspora tourism. The purpose of this study is to understand the lived experience of second-generation immigrants when they travel to their ancestral homeland, and explore the extent to which second-generation transnationalism shapes their diaspora tourism experiences. Using a phenomenological approach, 26 second-generation Chinese-Americans who had the experience of traveling in China were interviewed. Four themes were identified from semi-structured interviews: language and appearance, search for authenticity, family history, and sense of ‘home.’ Proficiency in their parental language was found to be a main cause of negative experiences, yet occasionally a source of pride and attachment. Their search for authentic experiences was not unlike other tourists, while familial obligations sometimes limited their experience. Traveling back to the homeland not only allowed them to understand their parents and family history, but also reflect upon their life through experiencing contemporary China. Finally, as the transnational attachment of second-generation immigrants was not rooted in a specific locale, they could feel connected to the homeland without actually visiting their family's place of origin. Findings contribute to transnationalism and diaspora tourism literature by comparing first- and second-generation immigrants and identifying the difference between contemporary transmigrants and classic diaspora groups with regard to their diaspora tourism experience.

摘要

离散旅游经常被认为是一种“回家”的形式, 但是对于移民他乡出生的子女, 他们是把父母的“故土”看作他们的“家”还是旅游目的地尚未知晓。而且, 交通与通讯技术的发展允许当今的移民维持与他们故土的联系, 这进一步影响了离散旅游性质。本研究旨在理解二代移民赴先祖故土旅行的现场体验, 探索二代移民跨国主义影响其离散旅游体验的程度。使用现象学的方法, 对 26 个曾赴中国旅行的二代美籍华人进行了访谈, 识别出四个主题༚语言与表象, 寻求原真性, 家族史和故乡感。发现, 对语言的熟悉程度是负面体验的主要原因, 尽管也偶尔是产生骄傲与依恋的来源。二代移民寻求真实体验与其他旅游者有所不同, 尽管家庭责任有时候会限制他们的旅游体验。回到故土不仅使他们了解了他们的父母和家族史, 也使得他们通过体验当代中国反思了他们的生活。最后, 由于二代移民的跨国依恋并未扎根于某一具体的场所, 他们可能实际上并未参访家族的来源地而仍能感觉与故土发生地方依恋。本研究通过比较一代与二代移民的旅游体验而有助于理解跨国主义与离散旅游文献, 识别出当代跨国移民与典型的离散群体在离散旅游体验方面的差异。

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1. Immigrant generational status has been labeled in different ways. In particular, the children of immigrants could be regarded as the ‘second generation’ of immigrants or the ‘first generation’ to be native born. Warner and Srole (Citation1945) called the native-born children of immigrants as the ‘filial first’ (F1) generation, and the grandchildren the ‘F2’ generation. On the other hand, both foreign-born immigrants and their native-born children are considered the immigrant-stock population in the USA (Rumbaut, Citation2002). Since the 1990s, there has been a proliferation of studies on the native-born children of immigrants in the USA, and they are more commonly referred to as second-generation immigrants (e.g. Portes, Citation1996; Waters, Citation1994).

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Wei-Jue Huang

Wei-Jue Huang is an assistant professor in the School of Hotel and Tourism Management at The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. Her research interests include cultural and heritage tourism, urban tourism, diaspora, and the leisure and travel behavior of diverse populations.

Gregory Ramshaw

Gregory Ramshaw is an associate professor in the Department of Parks, Recreation, and Tourism Management at Clemson University. His research interests include heritage sport tourism, heritage studies, world heritage, and tourism development.

William C. Norman

William C. Norman is a professor in the Department of Parks, Recreation, and Tourism Management at Clemson University. His research interests include travel behavior and decision-making, tourism marketing, sustainable tourism, and community tourism development.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 302.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.