Publication Cover
Tourism Geographies
An International Journal of Tourism Space, Place and Environment
Volume 25, 2023 - Issue 5
378
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

‘We’re managing a different river now’: a political ecology of nature-based recreation in the Dolores River Watershed

, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 1384-1403 | Received 24 Jan 2022, Accepted 27 Jan 2023, Published online: 03 Apr 2023
 

Abstract

The Dolores River is fed primarily by snowmelt from the western San Juan Mountains in southwestern Colorado. It travels 241 miles across the Colorado Plateau to its confluence with the Colorado River, near Moab, Utah, a major nature-based tourism destination in the U.S west. Water usage and climate change projections in the Dolores River Watershed, as well as throughout the Colorado River Basin, complicate transboundary planning and management related to vital ecosystem services. As dynamic pressures alter this complex social-ecological system, disparities in resource allocation are magnified. In this study, we leverage reflections from recreation, conservation, and land management stakeholders (n = 18) to understand their perceptions of water allocation within the Dolores River Watershed. We frame this conversation using Rawls’s (A theory of justice. Harvard University Press; JSTOR, 1971) theory of justice to explore perceived incompatibilities present within the existing watershed management and discuss recreational and environmental stakeholders’ perceptions of the inequitable distribution of resources. A combination of deductive coding processes using Rawls’s principles and inductive open coding processes help identify linkages between the Rawlsian framework and interviewees’ experiences of the salient political ecologies of the watershed. We conclude by illustrating challenges with the current water regime within the Dolores River Watershed and potential improvements to the distribution of resources through policy and management consistent with Rawls’s theory of justice.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This research was funded by small grants from the Sustainable Campus Initiative Fund and the Rio Mesa Bonderman Field Station of the University of Utah.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 302.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.