ABSTRACT
The pandemic renders valuable lessons for thinking what kind of science journalism is needed in a world of overlapping crises. Just as it confirms the crucial role of science (and science journalism) in the promotion of public welfare, the pandemic powerfully demonstrates the need to intertwine science with (post)development. As the epitome of global risks, the pandemic reminds us that a broad conception of science journalism is imperative. This is particularly so in the global South, where it has historically depended on scientific and information capabilities in the global North. Given that science comprises endless, complex and multifaceted issues, there are endless possibilities for storytelling. Science journalism needs to adopt multiple roles, including providing context, bringing up lay expertise and engaging with the public. Reassessing what kind of science journalism is needed beyond the traditional model of popularizing knowledge among the lay public.
Disclosure Statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.