Erratum

This article refers to:

Piecing together the sensitivity construct: ethology and cross-cultural research

Posada, G. (2013). Piecing together the sensitivity construct: ethology and cross-cultural research. Attachment & Human Development, 15(5-6), 637-656. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2013.842753

When the above article was published, Table 3 was formatted incorrectly. The correct table is shown below. Taylor & Francis apologises for this error.

Table 3. Ethnographic domains and their associations with sensitivity and security.

	Sensitivity (MBQS) r	Security (AQS) r
Specific domains of early care
1. Promptness of response	.61**	.51**
2. Response effectiveness	.55**	.63**
3. Behavioral consistency	.45**	.51**
4. Balance between responding to the baby & other demands	.51**	.33*
5. Balance between physical care & social interaction with baby	.36*	.57**
6. Enjoyment of interaction	.43**	.76**
7. Interactive smoothness	.49**	.55**
8. Frequency of physical contact	.40*	.55**
9. Quality of physical contact	.42**	.65**
10. Frequency of verbalizations	.30*	.53**
11. Diversity of functions in maternal verbalizations	.30*	.53**
Overall quality of care	.47**	.61**

Note: ** p < .01; * p ≤ .05.

Content taken from Posada et al. (2004).