http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2480-3708
![Sample our Social Sciences journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/110822/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Social-Sciences.jpg"})
ABSTRACT
Existing studies have fixated on the macroeconomic implications of Chinese engagements with Africa with relatively less attention to micro-level exchanges and the attendant social consequences. This paper captures the nuances of everyday dispositions and attitudes of Ghanaian traders toward Chinese entrepreneurial migrants relative to ‘older and larger’ immigrant trading groups (notably Indians, Lebanese and Nigerians). The study elicited data from local traders and key informants from trade unions, public institutions and academia. The findings indicate that Chinese merchants often had ‘aggressive’ and ‘overly competitive’ business style compared to other migrants and indigenes. Accordingly, several seemingly unresolvable underlying tensions ensued between the Chinese and other traders. It was evident that contextual elements such as trust and sense of fairness shaped the attitudes and degree of cordiality between the trading groups. Going forward, it will be prudent to focus not only on the legal and political ramifications of Chinese migratory flows but also develop measures to integrate the Chinese in African environment socially.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Notes
1. Tsikata, Fenny, and Aryeetey, “China-Africa Relations.”
2. Chen et al., “China and India.”
3. Burke, “China’s Entry into Construction Industries in Africa”, 323–336.
4. Kaplinsky and Morris, “Dangling by a Thread.”
5. Hodzi, “China and Africa”, 1–16.
6. Liu, “Contact and identity”, 184–201.
7. Haugen and Carling, “On the edge of the Chinese diaspora”, 639–662.
8. Axelsson, “Making borders.”
9. see Park, “One million Chinese in Africa.”
10. see Zhou, “Number of Chinese immigrants.”
11. Mung, “Chinese migration and China’s foreign policy”, 91–109.
12. Marfaing, and Thiel, “Chinese commodity imports.”
13. Jenkins and Edwards, “The effect of China and India’s growth”, 70.
14. Giovannetti, and Sanfilippo, “Do Chinese Exports Crowd-out African Goods?” 10–41.
15. Akinola, “The Political Economy of Chinese and Indian Trade”, 824–837.
16. see Park, “Chinese migration in Africa.”
17. Johnston, Morgan, and Wang, “The Gravity of China’s,” 913–934.
18. Dobler, “South-South business relations in practice.”
19. Haugen, “Chinese Exports to Africa,” 157–176.
20. Deumert and Mabandla, “Every day a new shop pops up,” 44–52.
21. Tremann, “Temporary Chinese migration to Madagascar,” 7–16.
22. Lam, “Chinese Adaptations”, 941.
23. Akyeampong, “Race, Identity and Citizenship in Black Africa,” 297–323.
24. Antwi Bosiakoh, “Nigerian Immigrant Entrepreneurs in Contemporary Ghana,” 143–163.
25. The International Organization for Migration (IOM) have extensively documented the migration trends in Ghana over the years including those of Chinese migrants.
26. Strange et al. “Tracking Underreported Financial Flows,” 935–963.
27. Levin, and Campbell, “Ethnocentrism,” 310.
28. Esses, Jackson and Armstrong, “Intergroup competition and attitudes toward immigrants and immigration,” 699–724.
29. Allport, “The Nature of Prejudice.”
30. Dixon, Durrheim, and Tredoux “Beyond the optimal contact strategy,” 697.
31. Schiappa et al., “The parasocial contact hypothesis,” 92–115.
32. Mohan and Tan-Mullins, Chinese Migrants in Africa as New Agents of Development.
33. Mohan, and Lampert, “Negotiating China,” 92–110.
34. see the Ghana Statistical Service, 2010 Population and Housing Census.
35. Sautman, and Yan, Friends and interests, 75–114.
36. Aryee, International Migration.
37. Mohan, et al., Chinese migrants and Africa’s development.
38. Besada, O’Bright, Maturing Sino–Africa relations, 655–677.
39. Kaplinsky, and Morris, Do the Asian Drivers Undermine Export-oriented, 254–273.
40. Zafar, The growing relationship between China, 103–130.
41. Esteban, A Silent Invasion? African Views on the Growing Chinese, 232–251.
42. Marfaing and Thiel, Demystifying Chinese business strength, 405–423.
43. Coser, Social conflict and the theory, 197–207.
44. Ho, The ‘Doing’ and ‘Undoing’ of Community, 46–77.
45. Angen, Evaluating interpretive inquiry, 378–95.
46. Bryman, Social Research Methods.
47. Guba, Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness, 75–91.
48. Kearns, Seeing with Clarity
49. Meuleman, Davidov and Billiet, Changing attitudes toward immigration, 352–365.
50. Park, Boundaries, Borders and Borderland Constructions, 457–479.
51. Lu, and Wu, “Rethinking integration and identity,” 475–490.
52. Zarate, et al., “Cultural threat and perceived realistic group,” 99–105.
53. Ng, Intergroup Behaviour and Ethnicity, 19–34.
Additional information
Funding
Notes on contributors
Kwaku Opoku Dankwah
Kwaku Opoku Dankwah is a PhD candidate at the Department of Politics and International Relations of the University of Adelaide, South Australia. He obtained his MSc (Globalization) and BA (Political Science) from the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (Norway) and the University of Ghana (Ghana) respectively. His research interests span across Africa-China relations to international relations and migration.
Padmore Adusei Amoah
Padmore Adusei Amoah, is an Assistant Professor (Research) at Lingnan University, Hong Kong, where he also obtained his PhD (Social Policy) from Department of Sociology and Social Policy. He received his MPhil (Development Studies) from Norwegian University of Science and Technology (Norway), and BSc (Development Planning) from Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (Ghana). His current research interests comprise comparative social policy, social and health-related inequalities, social epidemiology and health promotion among youth, the elderly and general populations. Padmore embraces both qualitative and quantitative research methods.