ABSTRACT
While supporting the values and goals of sustainable development at the international level, states might employ very different strategies at the national level. The goal of this Forward and of special issue is twofold. First, it aims to advance our understanding of different strategies, paying special attention to China and Russia at global, national, and sub-national levels. Thus, analysis of their strategies across different levels presents a more rounded picture. The second goal is to identify at least a few of the most pressing challenges of sustainable development across Eurasia (e.g. nuclear supply chain, emissions, environmental conflict management) and to attempt to understand their triggers, outcomes, and potential solutions. This Forward aspires to develop a better dialogue across different sets of literature in area studies, environmental politics, and international relations to improve our understanding of obstacles to sustainable development in Eurasia.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Notes
1. I would like thank all the contributors to this special issue for their inspiration and support: Joan Martinez-Alier and Ksenija Hanaček, Jale Tosun and Karina Shyrokykh, A. L. Demchuk and Mile Mišić, Marianna Poberezhskaya and Alina Bychkova, Ilya A. Stepanov and Igor A. Makarov, Raufhon Salahodjaev and Arletta Isaeva. I take this opportunity to thank the Basic Research Programme of the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE University) for funding the research presented in this article.
3. On the EU and diffusion of democracy, see, (Ambrosio, Citation2010; Börzel & Solingen, Citation2014; Kopstein & Reilly, Citation2000; Lankina et al., Citation2016a; Levitsky & Way, Citation2010; Obydenkova, Citation2008; Pevehouse, Citation2005; Whitehead, Citation1996). On democratisation in Eurasia, see for example, Teorell (Citation2010).
5. On Russia and China, see, (Sun & Alex, Citation2016; Tosun & Rinscheid, Citation2021; Venable, Citation2011; Yu, Citation2015; Zhang et al., Citation2019; Zhang & Xue-Feng, Citation2019). On IOs as actors of sustainable development, see, Biermann and Bauer (Citation2004). On the EU’s impact, see, Andonova and Tuta (Citation2014).
6. On the vertical of power and territorial (de-)centralisation in Russia, see for example, Obydenkova and Swenden (Citation2013). On sub-national actors in environmental politics (deforestation) see, Libman and Obydenkova (Citation2014); and on subnational corruption in Russia, see for example, Dinino and Orttung (Citation2005), Obydenkova and Libman (Citation2015).
7. Previous studies have pointed out that loans, trade, and investment might include environmental conditionality (e.g. on banks, see, Ambrosio et al., Citation2021; Anastassia et al., Citation2021; Djalilov & Hartwell, Citation2021; Gutner, Citation2002; Hall et al., Citation2021). Other studies demonstrate that, in some cases, financial development reduces CO2 emissions, while economic growth may increase CO2 emissions (e.g. Shahbaz et al., Citation2013).
8. The importance of public opinion, transparency, and the power of independent mass media in environmental conflict management was outlined in a number of studies (e.g. Mišić & Obydenkova, Citation2021).
9. A similar argument can also be found in Kochtcheeva (Citation2021).
10. To some extent, this argument echoes studies on the diffusion of (democratic) values and practices developed within international dimension of democratisation (e.g. Kopstein & Reilly, Citation2000; Lankina et al., Citation2016a; Obydenkova, Citation2008).
11. Very recent studies have demonstrated that even loans and investment coming from the EBRD and associated with strong environmental conditionality can be subverted by China (see for example, Anastassia et al., Citation2021).
Beissinger, M., and Kotkin, S. (eds.). (2014). Historical legacies of communism in Russia and Eastern Europe. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. Pop-Eleches, G., & Tucker, J. A. (2017). Communism's shadow: Historical legacies and contemporary political attitudes. Princeton University Press: Princeton. Libman, A., & Obydenkova, A. (2020). Proletarian internationalism in action? Communist legacies and attitudes towards migrants in Russia. Problems of Post-Communism, 67(4–5), 402–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2019.1640068 Obydenkova, A., & Libman, A. (2012). The impact of external factors on regime transition: Lessons from the Russian regions. Post-Soviet Affairs, 28(3), 346–401. https://doi.org/10.2747/1060-586X.28.3.346 Lankina, T. V., Libman, A., & Obydenkova, A. (2016b). Appropriation and subversion. World Politics, 68(2), 229–274. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887115000428 Ambrosio, T. (2010). Constructing a framework of authoritarian diffusion: Concepts, dynamics, and future research. International Studies Perspective, 11(4), 375–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-3585.2010.00411.x Solingen, E. , Börzel, T. A. (2014). Introduction to Presidential Issue: The Politics of International Diffusion—A Symposium. International Studies Review, 16(2), 173–187. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24032870 Kopstein, J., & Reilly, D. (2000). Geographic diffusion and the transformation of the postcommunist world. World Politics, 53(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100009369 Lankina, T., Libman, A., & Obydenkova, A. (2016a). Authoritarian and democratic diffusion in post-communist regions. Comparative Political Studies, 49(12), 1599–1629. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016628270 Levitsky, S., & Way, L. (2010). Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge University Press. Obydenkova, A. (2008). Regime transition in the regions of Russia: The freedom of mass media: Transnational impact on sub-national democratization? European Journal of Political Research, 47(2), 221–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00727.x Pevehouse, J. (2005). Democracy from above? Regional organizations and democratization. Cambridge University Press. Whitehead, L. (ed.). (1996). International dimension of democratization: Europe and the Americas. Oxford University Press. Teorell, J. (2010). Determinants of democratization: Explaining regime change in the World, 1972–2006. Cambridge University Press. Izotov, V. S., & Obydenkova, A. V. (2021). Geopolitical games in Eurasian regionalism: Ideational interactions and regional international organisations. Post-Communist Economies, 33(2–3), 150–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2020.1793584 Kneuer, M., & Demmelhuber, T. (2016). Gravity centers of authoritarian rule: A conceptual approach. Democratization, 23(5), 775–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2015.1018898 Libman, A., & Obydenkova, A. V. (2018a). Understanding authoritarian regionalism. Journal of Democracy, 29(4), 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2018.0070 Libman, A., & Obydenkova, A. V. (2018b). Regional international organizations as a strategy of autocracy: The Eurasian economic union and Russian foreign policy. International Affairs, 94(5), 1037–1058. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiy147 Sun, Y., & Alex, L. (2016). Carbon trading in China: Environmental discourse and politics. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Global Environmental Politics, 16(3), 159–161. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_r_00372 Tosun, J., & Rinscheid, A. (2021). The clean energy ministerial: Motivation for and policy consequences of membership. International Political Science Review, 42(1), 114–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120942303 Venable, S. (2011). Red to green: Environmental activism in post-soviet Russia. Global Environmental Politics, 11(3), 154–156. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_r_00076 Zhang, D., Fan, F., & Pak, S. D. (2019). Network analysis of actors and policy keywords for sustainable environmental governance: Focusing on Chinese environmental policy. Sustainability, 11(15), 4068. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154068 Zhang, N., & Xue-Feng, J. (2019). The effect of environmental policy on Chinese firm’s green productivity and shadow price: A metafrontier input distance function approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144, 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.04.015 Biermann, F., & Bauer, S. (2004). Assessing the effectiveness of intergovernmental organizations in international environmental politics. Global Environmental Change, 14(2), 189–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(03)00025-6 Andonova, L. B., & Tuta, I. A. (2014). Transnational networks and paths to EU environmental compliance: Evidence from new member states. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(4), 775–793. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12126 Obydenkova, A., & Swenden, W. (2013). Autocracy-sustaining versus democratic federalism: Explaining the divergent trajectories of territorial politics in Russia and Western Europe. Territory, Politics, Governance, 1(1), 86–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2013.763733 Libman, A., & Obydenkova, A. (2014). Governance of commons in a large nondemocratic country: The case of forestry in the Russian federation. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 44(2), 298–323. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjt065 Dininio, P., & Orttung, R. (2005). Explaining patterns of corruption in the Russian regions. World Politics, 57(4), 500–529. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2006.0008 Obydenkova, A., & Libman, A. (2015). The survival of post-communist corruption in contemporary Russia: The influence of historical legacies. Post-Soviet Affairs, 31(4), 304–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2014.931683 Ambrosio, T., Hall, A., & Obydenkova, A. (2021). Sustainable development agendas of regional international organizations: The European Bank of reconstruction and development and the Eurasian development bank. Problems of Post-Communism, 1–13. Accessed on 3 December, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2021.1979412 Obydenkova, A., Rodrigues Vieira, V. G., & Tosun, J. (2021). The impact of new actors in global environmental politics: The European bank for reconstruction and development meets China. Post-Communist Economies. Accessed on 3 December, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2021.1954825 Djalilov, K., & Hartwell, C. (2021). Do social and environmental capabilities improve bank stability? Evidence from transition countries. Post-Communist Economies, 1–23. Accessed on 3 December, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2021.1965359 Gutner, T. (2002). Banking on the environment: Multilateral development banks and their environmental performance in central and Eastern Europe. MIT Press. Hall, S. G. F., Lenz, T., & Obydenkova, A. (2021). Environmental commitments and rhetoric over the Pandemic crisis: Social media and legitimation of the AIIB, the EAEU, and the EU. Post-Communist Economies, 1–26. Accessed on 3 December, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2021.1954824 Shahbaz, M., Solarin, S. A., Mahmood, H., & Arouri, M. (2013). Does financial development reduce CO2 emissions in Malaysian economy? A time series analysis. Economic Modelling, 35, 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.06.037 Mišić, M., & Obydenkova, A. (2021). Environmental conflict, renewable energy, or both? Public opinion on small hydropower plants in Serbia. Post-Communist Economies, 1–30. Accessed on 3 December, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2021.1943928 Kochtcheeva, L. V. (2021). Foreign policy, national interests, and environmental positioning: Russia’s post Paris climate change actions, discourse, and engagement. Problems of Post-Communism, 1–13. Accessed on 3 December, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2021.1968912 Kopstein, J., & Reilly, D. (2000). Geographic diffusion and the transformation of the postcommunist world. World Politics, 53(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100009369 Lankina, T., Libman, A., & Obydenkova, A. (2016a). Authoritarian and democratic diffusion in post-communist regions. Comparative Political Studies, 49(12), 1599–1629. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016628270 Obydenkova, A. (2008). Regime transition in the regions of Russia: The freedom of mass media: Transnational impact on sub-national democratization? European Journal of Political Research, 47(2), 221–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00727.x Obydenkova, A., Rodrigues Vieira, V. G., & Tosun, J. (2021). The impact of new actors in global environmental politics: The European bank for reconstruction and development meets China. Post-Communist Economies. Accessed on 3 December, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2021.1954825