156
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Association of a visual oral health literacy instrument with perceived and clinical oral health status in Japanese adolescents

, , , , &
Pages 303-314 | Received 20 Jun 2014, Accepted 12 Mar 2015, Published online: 08 Apr 2015
 

Abstract

A visual oral health literacy instrument is a newly developed tool to assess health literacy level in dentistry. To use the visual oral health literacy instrument effectively, it is essential to understand how the instrument is associated with the subjects’ perceived and clinical oral health status. The purpose of this study was to examine which factor of subjects’ perceived and clinical oral health status affected the visual oral health literacy instrument. A self-administered questionnaire inquiring about concern about teeth and gums, self-rated oral health and oral observation, as well as a mouth drawing as a visual oral health literacy instrument were evaluated in 162 Grade 1 Japanese senior high school students. Students were instructed to freely draw a picture of their anterior teeth and gingiva while observing their mouth with a hand mirror. Mouth drawings were performed before (first) and after (second) an oral health education session. Drawing scores were calculated for both tooth and gingival aspects. In female subjects, those who observed their mouth every day had a significantly higher first tooth-recognition score than those who did not (p < 0.05). First and second gingival-recognition scores were significantly related with clinical gingival condition (p < 0.05). Subjects who observed their mouth daily and those who had occlusal or gingival problems significantly improved their second drawing scores (p < 0.05). The changes of oral health literacy had an association with their oral observation habit and actual oral health status. Therefore, it is necessary to provide self-related oral health education in order for students to correctly understand their own oral health status.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

Additional information

Funding

This study was partly funded by the Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [grant number KAKENHI No. 24593142].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 155.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.