ABSTRACT
José Francisco Isla’s Fray Gerundio de Campazas is one of the first and most complete accounts of the insidious omnipresence of bullshit in modern culture. Drawing on recent debates on bullshit as well as ordinary language philosophy, this paper conceives of bullshit as both a language game and a form of life. Bullshitting alters linguistic exchanges, moral standards and social relations in decisive and unsettling ways. Relating bullshit to ignorance, self-interest, the bewitchment of language and the individual’s emancipation from authority, Fray Gerundio warns us of the dangers lurking behind bullshit by uncovering its condition of possibility, its lexicon, its grammar and its pragmatics. Isla denounces the problems that arise when words are taken out of their ordinary context. In its final chapter, Fray Gerundio playfully acknowledges itself to be an instance of bullshit, thereby hinting at a crucial dimension of this phenomenon, namely the points of overlap between fiction and bullshit. Ultimately, this paper hopes to shed new light on bullshit as well as on Fray Gerundio by treating this novel as a lesson in moral philosophy that relates to present concerns about the pervasiveness of dishonesty, concealment and deceit in personal relations as well as public discourse and institutions.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.
Notes on contributor
Nil Santiáñez is a Professor of Spanish and International Studies at Saint Louis University. His books include Topographies of Fascism (University of Toronto Press, 2013), Goya/Clausewitz (Alpha Decay, 2009), Investigaciones literarias (Crítica, 2002), Ángel Ganivet: Una bibliografía anotada (1892–1995) (Diputación Provincial de Granada, 1996), De la Luna a Mecanópolis (Quaderns Crema-Sirmio, 1995) and Ángel Ganivet, escritor modernista (Gredos, 1994). In addition to scholarly critical editions of works by Lope de Vega and Ramón J. Sender, he has authored numerous articles, prologues and book chapters on eighteenth-, nineteenth- and twentieth-century Spanish and European literature and culture. He is currently writing a book titled Signaturas del mal (Alpha Decay) and working with Justin Crumbaugh on a book titled Spanish Fascist Writing (University of Toronto Press). His latest book, Wittgenstein’s Ethics and Modern Warfare, is forthcoming from Wilfrid Laurier University Press in fall 2018.
Notes
1 Representative scholarly works on bullshit are Babbitt (Citation2013), Black (Citation1983, 115–143), Eubanks and Schaeffer (Citation2008), Frankfurt (Citation2005), Hardcastle and Reisch (Citation2006) and Penny (Citation2005). The publication in 2012 of Aaron James’s provocative philosophical account of “assholes” (Citation2014) may be considered an aftereffect of the heightened scholarly attention paid in the previous 10 years to matters related to bullshit.
2 The U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003, for instance, was preceded in the United States by unusual amounts of political and journalistic justificatory bullshit.
3 In these pages, I use the notion of genealogy as employed by Michel Foucault. For a quick introduction to Foucault’s concept of genealogy, see Foucault (Citation2001, 1: 1004–1024).
4 Modernity is used here as a periodological term that describes the historical era that runs approximately from the eighteenth century to the present. The so-called age of globalization is not a new epoch in history, but rather a transitional period.
6 I am thinking, for instance, of Aradra Sánchez (Citation1999), Briesemeister (Citation1986), Chen Sham (Citation1990, Citation1991, Citation1992, Citation1994, Citation1995, Citation2002), Haidt (Citation1994, Citation2002), Helman (Citation1955), Martínez Fernández (Citation1999), Palmer (Citation1973) and Sebold (Citation1958).
7 On the preponderance of bullshit in present-day discourse, see Black (Citation1983, 115–143), Frankfurt (Citation2005, 1–2), Penny (Citation2005, 1–2), Hardcastle and Reisch (Citation2006, xiii–xiv) and Richardson (Citation2006, 87, 90–95).
10 The study of the rules underpinning the language game “to bullshit” is still a pending task in specialized scholarship.
12 See Alan Sokal and Jean Bricmont’s (Citation1998) book on the “fashionable nonsense” produced by several extremely influential contemporary thinkers. This important work has much in common with the scholarship devoted to studying bullshit.
14 Although modernity proper emerges in Spain in the eighteenth century, there are earlier instances of modern attitudes. A Cartesian doubt of sorts and empiricism had already been deployed by the Spanish philosopher Francisco Sánchez in his book Que nada se sabe, published in Latin in 1581, while Francisco Gutiérrez de los Ríos y Córdoba argued, in El hombre práctico (1680), that the direct observation of nature is the only criterion for certainty. See Pérez-Magallón’s (Citation2002) important book on the novatores for an exploration of early modernity in Spain. For other treatments of the origins of modernity in Spain, see Iarocci (Citation2006) and Santiáñez (Citation2002).
Babbitt, Paul. 2013. “Taking Bulls**t Seriously.” Chronicle of Higher Education 60 (12): b4–b5. Black, Max. 1983. The Prevalence of Humbug and Other Essays. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Eubanks, Philip, and John D. Schaeffer. 2008. “A Kind Word for Bullshit: The Problem of Academic Writing.” College Composition and Communication 59 (3): 372–388. Frankfurt, Harry G. 2005. On Bullshit. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Hardcastle, Gary L., and George A. Reisch, eds. 2006. Bullshit and Philosophy: Guaranteed to Get Perfect Results Every Time. Chicago: Open Court. Penny, Laura. 2005. Your Call is Important to Us: The Truth about Bullshit. New York: Crown Publishers. James, Aaron J. 2014. Assholes: A Theory. New York: Anchor Books. Foucault, Michel. 2001. Dits et écrits, 1954–1988. 4th ed., 2 vols. Edited by François Ewald and Daniel Defert. Paris: Éditions Gallimard. Chen Sham, Jorge.. 2002. “La sátira del letrado en el siglo XVIII español: ¿Cliché o sociotipo?” Dieciocho: Hispanic Enlightenment 25 (2): 229–242. Haidt, Rebecca.. 2002. Seduction and Sacrilege: Rhetorical Power in Fray Gerundio de Campazas. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press. Jurado, José. 1989. “El Fray Gerundio y la oratoria sagrada barroca.” Edad de Oro 8: 97–105. Aradra Sánchez, Rosa María. 1999. “Las formas de la teoría literaria del siglo XVIII: El Fray Gerundio como retórica novelada.” Revista de Literatura 61 (121): 61–81. Briesemeister, Dietrich. 1986. “La aventura de leer en Fray Gerundio.” Iberoromania: Zeitschrift fur die Iberoromanischen Sprachen und Literaturen in Europa und Amerika/Revista Dedica 23: 125–148. Chen Sham, Jorge. 1990. “Hacia una lectura de la estrategia paratextual del Fray Gerundio de Campazas: La fuerza centrípeta del prólogo autorial.” Revista de Filologia y Linguistica de la Universidad de Costa Rica 16 (2): 7–24. Chen Sham, Jorge.. 1991. “La teoría del paratexto y el Fray Gerundio de Campazas: La puesta en escena de una retórica de lo liminar.” Revista de Filologia y Linguistica de la Universidad de Costa Rica 17 (1–2): 7–19. Chen Sham, Jorge.. 1992. “Recepción literaria y contrato satírico: Un acercamiento a la polémica desatada por el Fray Gerundio de Campazas.” Káñina: Revista de Artes y Letras de la Universidad de Costa Rica 16 (1): 125–141. Chen Sham, Jorge.. 1994. “El intertexto cervantino en un texto dieciochesco español: El Fray Gerundio de Campazas.” Káñina: Revista de Artes y Letras de la Universidad de Costa Rica 18 (2): 85–94. Chen Sham, Jorge.. 1995. “Perfecit y denegación final del contrato historiográfico en el Fray Gerundio de Campazas.” Revista de Filologia y Linguistica de la Universidad de Costa Rica 21 (2): 83–90. Chen Sham, Jorge.. 2002. “La sátira del letrado en el siglo XVIII español: ¿Cliché o sociotipo?” Dieciocho: Hispanic Enlightenment 25 (2): 229–242. Haidt, Rebecca. 1994. “Fray Gerundio and Luxury: The Rococo Aesthetics of Feminized Form.” Dieciocho: Hispanic Enlightenment 17 (2): 143–162. Haidt, Rebecca.. 2002. Seduction and Sacrilege: Rhetorical Power in Fray Gerundio de Campazas. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press. Helman, Edith F. 1955. “Padre Isla and Goya.” Hispania 38 (2): 150–158. doi: 10.2307/335806 Martínez Fernández, José Enrique. 1999. “Burla, sátira y humor en Fray Gerundio de Campazas (huellas de la comicidad carnavalesca).” Epos: Revista de Filología 15: 175–197. Palmer, Joe L. 1973. “‘La juventud triunfante’ and the Origins of Padre Isla’s Satire.” Hispania 56 (1): 75–80. doi: 10.2307/339040 Sebold, Russell P. 1958. “Naturalistic Tendencies and the Descent of the Hero in Isla’s Fray Gerundio.” Hispania 41 (3): 308–314. doi: 10.2307/334814 Black, Max. 1983. The Prevalence of Humbug and Other Essays. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Frankfurt, Harry G. 2005. On Bullshit. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Penny, Laura. 2005. Your Call is Important to Us: The Truth about Bullshit. New York: Crown Publishers. Hardcastle, Gary L., and George A. Reisch, eds. 2006. Bullshit and Philosophy: Guaranteed to Get Perfect Results Every Time. Chicago: Open Court. Richardson, Alan. 2006. “Performing Bullshit and the Post-sincere Condition.” In Bullshit and Philosophy: Guaranteed to Get Perfect Results Every Time, edited by Gary L. Hardcastle and George A. Reisch, 83–97. Chicago: Open Court. Chen Sham, Jorge. 1990. “Hacia una lectura de la estrategia paratextual del Fray Gerundio de Campazas: La fuerza centrípeta del prólogo autorial.” Revista de Filologia y Linguistica de la Universidad de Costa Rica 16 (2): 7–24. Chen Sham, Jorge.. 1991. “La teoría del paratexto y el Fray Gerundio de Campazas: La puesta en escena de una retórica de lo liminar.” Revista de Filologia y Linguistica de la Universidad de Costa Rica 17 (1–2): 7–19. Smith, Susan M. 1995. “El morrión del padre Isla: La dedicatoria y el prólogo de Fray Gerundio.” Dieciocho: Hispanic Enlightenment 18 (1): 91–102. Chen Sham, Jorge.. 1994. “El intertexto cervantino en un texto dieciochesco español: El Fray Gerundio de Campazas.” Káñina: Revista de Artes y Letras de la Universidad de Costa Rica 18 (2): 85–94. Haidt, Rebecca.. 2002. Seduction and Sacrilege: Rhetorical Power in Fray Gerundio de Campazas. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press. Scherer, Ludger. 2005. “Diálogo de los prólogos: La Historia del famoso predicador Fray Gerundio de Campazas de José Francisco de Isla y el Quijote de Miguel de Cervantes.” In Literatura-Cultura-Media-Lengua: Nuevos planteamientos de la investigación del siglo XVIII en España e Hispanoamérica, edited by Christian von Tschilschke and Andreas Gelz, 177–186. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. Haidt, Rebecca. 1994. “Fray Gerundio and Luxury: The Rococo Aesthetics of Feminized Form.” Dieciocho: Hispanic Enlightenment 17 (2): 143–162. Sokal, Alan, and Jean Bricmont. 1998. Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals’ Abuse of Science. New York: Picador. Chen Sham, Jorge.. 1995. “Perfecit y denegación final del contrato historiográfico en el Fray Gerundio de Campazas.” Revista de Filologia y Linguistica de la Universidad de Costa Rica 21 (2): 83–90. Pérez-Magallón, Jesús. 2002. Construyendo la modernidad: la cultura española en el tiempo de los Novatores (1675–1725). Madrid: CSIC. Iarocci, Michael. 2006. Properties of Modernity: Romantic Spain, Modern Europe, and the Legacies of Empire. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press. Santiáñez, Nil. 2002. Investigaciones literarias: Modernidad, historia de la literatura y modernismos. Barcelona: Crítica.