Abstract
Subjects were given a prediction task in which they had to learn that one cue, P (positive), was followed by the outcome, and a compound of P and another cue, N (negative), was not followed by the outcome. Next, N was tested in compound with a transfer cue, T, which had signalled the outcome but had never been compounded with N. Experiment 1 confirmed an important assumption of the Rescorla–Wagner model (Wagner & Rescorla, 1972) that negation of T should depend on the specific P cue compound with N being positively contingent. Experiments 2 and 3 confirmed the model's prediction that no decrement in negative transfer should be observed following postlearning devaluation of P. Unfortunately, the model did not anticipate that a large proportion of devaluation trials relative to learning trials would attenuate negative transfer (Experiment 4), nor did it predict that negative transfer would occur when P was neutral during the learning stage and was only later made positive (Experiment 3). The results can be accommodated by the Rescorla–Wagner model if one assumes that absent cues have their associative strengths altered.
This research was supported by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. We thank Kenneth W. Johns for his comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.
Notes
This research was supported by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. We thank Kenneth W. Johns for his comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.
