ABSTRACT
Introduction
Although statin therapy is a powerful lipid-lowering strategy, only one-fifth of statin users currently reach their lipid goals. In addition, statin treatment alone has relatively low efficacy in reducing other lipid fractions than low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C). In such cases, most guidelines recommend adding the cholesterol absorption inhibitor ezetimibe.
Areas covered
This paper summarizes the main pharmacological characteristics of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe (mechanism of action, metabolism), their lipid-lowering and pleiotropic effects, with particular attention to the clinical effects of the combined drugs in hypercholesterolemia and mixed dyslipidemia patients (such as the ones affected by diabetes mellitus and Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS)).
Expert opinion
The additive effect of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe helps to reach lipid goals in a large number of high-risk patients, while avoiding some safety issues related to high dosages of intensive statin therapy. Patients with diabetes receive additional benefits from ezetimibe as they seem to absorb cholesterol more effectively than non-diabetic ones, because of increased NPC1L1 gene expression. Ezetimibe augments rosuvastatin triglyceride-lowering and anti-inflammatory effects, as well. Taking into account its excellent safety profile and lack of clinically relevant drug-drug interactions, the rosuvastatin/ezetimibe association is a valuable alternative to statin dose uptitration.
Article highlights
Statins and Ezetimibe have synergistic lipid-lowering pharmacological actions.
Rosuvastatin is the most powerful available statin.
Additive effect of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe helps to reach lipid goals in a large number of high-risk patients, while avoiding some safety issues related to high dosages of intensive statin therapy.
Both drugs have a high safety profile and a very low risk of pharmacological interaction.
Declaration of interest
The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.
Reviewer disclosures
One referee is an employee of National Clinical Research, Inc. Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no other relevant financial relationships or otherwise to disclose.