ABSTRACT
Introduction
Accounting for 90% of all traumatic brain injuries (TBIs), mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is currently the most frequently seen type of TBI. Although most patients can recover from mTBI, some may suffer from prolonged symptoms for months to years after injury. Growing evidence indicates that mTBI is associated with neurodegenerative diseases, including dementia and Parkinson’s disease (PD). Pharmacological interventions are necessary to address the symptoms and avoid the adverse consequences of mTBI.
Areas covered
To provide an overview of the current treatment options, the authors herein review the potential drugs to reduce the secondary damage and symptom-targeted therapy, as well as the ongoing clinical trials of pharmacotherapy for mTBI.
Expert opinion
There has been no consensus on pharmacotherapy for mTBI. Several candidates, including n-3 PUFAs, melatonin, NAC, and statins show potential benefits in lessening the secondary injury and improving neurological deficits in preclinic studies, which, however, still need further investigation in clinical trials. The current pharmacotherapy for mTBI is empirical in nature and mainly targets to mitigate the symptoms. Well-designed clinical trials are now warranted to provide high-level evidence.
Article highlights
Accounting for 90% of all TBIs, mTBI is currently the most common type of TBI.
mTBI is associated with dementia, PD, and other neurodegenerative diseases.
There has been no consensus on the pharmacotherapy of mTBI.
n-3 PUFAs, melatonin, NAC, and statins show potential benefits in lessening the secondary injury and improving neurological deficits in pre-clinic studies.
The current pharmacotherapy for mTBI is mostly an empirical treatment and mainly targets to mitigate the symptoms.
Well-designed clinical trials were warranted to provide high-level evidence.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Z Li for their assistance with language editing in the manuscript.
Declaration of Interest
The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.
Reviewer Disclosures
Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.