Why people enter treatment for alcohol problems: Findings from UK Alcohol Treatment Trial pre‐treatment interviews

Abstract

Aim: To develop a model of why people seek professional treatment for drinking problems, grounded in what clients say about the process at treatment entry.

Participants: Three sets of consecutive entrants to the UK Alcohol Treatment Trial, sets commencing at intervals during trial recruitment (total n = 98).

Location: Statutory and non‐statutory alcohol problem treatment agencies in three areas of England and Wales.

Data: Open‐ended interviews according to a brief interview guide, leading to 400–800‐word post‐interview reports used for analysis (tape recordings used for auditing the interview and analysis process).

Analysis: Reports analysed by a team according to grounded theory principles, involving an iterative process with successive refinement of interviewing and analysis with each successive set of data.

Findings: A model of professional treatment entry was developed, refined and “tested” with the last set of data. The process of seeking professional treatment was depicted in the model as involving a realization of worsening, accumulating and multiple problems related to drinking, especially in health and family domains; in conjunction with, in most cases (but not all), a trigger event and/or family or professional influence; combined with rejection of the possibility of unaided change or non‐professional help; leading to the seeking or accepting of professional help.

Conclusions: The findings support conclusions already in the literature about the process of seeking professional help for a drinking problem, but provide further refinement of existing ideas: for example regarding the accumulation of drinking‐related problems, the ways in which a realization of those problems combines with triggers or pressure, and the complex role of the family and primary care professionals in assisting motivation to seek treatment.

• Alcohol problems
• treatment entry
• qualitative data

View correction statement:

ERRATUM

Acknowledgements

The support of the UKATT Trial Steering Committee and the financial support of the Medical Research Council (UK) are gratefully acknowledged. Thanks are also due to Mrs Pat Evans, who prepared the manuscript of this paper.