Influence of competitive intensity on stadium attendance. An analysis of the French football Ligue 1 over the period 2009-2019 through a visualization system

ABSTRACT

The relationship between competitive balance or intensity and venue attendance has been extensively tested in the literature. These studies have used complex metrics and econometric testing. This does not favour their understanding and application by managers. This article investigates, over a 10 years period (2009–2019), the influence of competitive intensity on stadium attendance for the French men’s football Ligue 1 through a visualization approach. The use of this method provides visual information via a single chart per season about the influence of competitive intensity on attendance, depending on the moment in the season and the sporting stakes. This means that managers can look at relevant information in one single chart. The article shows the positive influence on attendance of competitive intensity in relation to the different sporting stakes, consistent with previous studies. The visualization approach makes the results easy to grasp for managers, facilitating the identification of managerial implications.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1. Andreff, Staudohar, ‘The Evolving European Model of Professional Sports Finance’.

2. Rascher et al., ‘The Unique Economic Aspects of Sport’.

3. Deighton, ‘The Consumption of Performance’.

4. Hunt, A General Theory of Competition.

5. Fort and Maxcy, ‘Comment’; and Valenti et al., ‘Attendance in Elite Women’s Football’.

6. Andreff, Scelles, ‘Walter C. Neale 50 Years After’; Plumley et al., ‘Mind the Gap’; Plumley et al., ‘The Unintended Consequences of Financial Fair-play’; Ramchandani et al., ‘A Longitudinal and Comparative Analysis of Competitive Balance’; Scelles et al., ‘Competitive Balance Versus Competitive Intensity’; and Scelles et al., ‘Determinants of Competitive Balance’.

7. Rottenberg, ‘The Baseball Players’ Labour Market’; Neale, ‘The Peculiar Economics of Professional Sports’; and Sloane, ‘The Labour Market in Professional Fooball’.

8. Boyd, Krehbiel, ‘Promotion Timing in major League Baseball’.

9. Falter, Perignon, ‘Demand for Football and Intramatch Winning Probability’.

10. Garcia, Rodriguez, ‘Determinants of Football Match Attendance Revisited’.

11. Scelles et al., ‘Competitive Balance Versus Competitive Intensity’; Scelles et al., ‘My Team is in Contention’; and Scelles et al., ‘Do All Sporting Prizes have Significant Positive Impact’.

12. Andreff, Scelles, ‘Walter C. Neale 50 Years After’.

13. Kringstad, Gerrard, ‘The Concepts of Competitive Balance’; and ‘Theory and Evidence on Competitive Intensity’.

14. Scelles et al., ‘Marketing in Sport Leagues’.

15. Scelles et al., ‘Intra-Match Competitive Intensity’.

16. Baade, Tiehen, ‘An Analysis of Major League Baseball Attendance’; Noll, ’Attendance and Price Setting’; and Wells et al., ‘Attendance at Division II Football Games’.

17. Buraimo et al., ‘Attendance Demand in a Developing Football Market’; Storm et al., ‘The Complex Challenge of Spectator Demand’; Valenti et al., ‘Attendance in Elite Women’s Football’; and Welki, Zlatoper, ‘US Professional Football’.

18. Laverie and Arnett, ‘Factors Affecting Fan Attendance’.

19. O’Reilly and Nadeau, ‘Revenue Generation in Professional Sport’.

20. Zhang et al., ‘General Market Demand Variables’.

21. Laverie and Arnett, ‘Factors Affecting Fan’.

22. Arnett and Laverie, ‘Fan Characteristics and Sporting Event Attendance’.

23. Noll, ‘Attendance and Price Setting’.

24. Robinson and DeSchriver, ‘Consumer Differences Across Large and Small Market Teams’.

25. Hansen and Gauthier, ‘Factors Affecting Attendance’.

26. Kim et al., ‘Market Segmentation in the K-League’.

27. Zhang et al., ‘General Market Demand Variables’.

28. Fink et al., ‘Environmental Factors Associated with Spectator Attendance’.

29. Kim et al., ‘Market Segmentation in K-League’.

30. Rottenberg, ‘The Baseball Players’ Labour Market’.

31. Baird et al., ‘Dominance in College in Football’; Bennet et al., ‘Telecast Deregulation’; Fort and Maxcy, ‘Comment’; Fort and Quirk, ‘Pay Dirt’; Groot, ‘Economics, Uncertainty and European Football’; Humprheys, ‘Alternative Measures of Competitive Balance’; Scelles et al., ‘Determinants of Competitive Balance’; Scully, ‘The Business of Major League Baseball’; and Szymanski, ‘The Economics Design of Sporting Contests’.

32. Whitney, ‘Winning Games Versus Winning Championships’.

33. Scully, ‘The Business of MLB’.

34. Szymanski, ‘The Economic Design of Sporting Contests’.

35. Michie, Oughton, ‘Competitive Balance in Football’.

36. Plumley et al., ‘Mind the Gap’; Plumley et al., ‘The Unintended Consequences of Financial Fair-Play’; and Ramchandani et al., ‘A Longitudinal and Comparative Analysis of Competitive Balance’.

37. See e.g. Scelles et al., ‘Determinants of Competitive Balance’.

38. Neale, ‘The Peculiar Economics of Professional Sports’.

39. Andreff, Scelles, ‘Walter C. Neale 50 Years Later’.

40. Kringstad, Gerrard, ‘The Concepts of Competitive Balance’; and ‘Theory and Evidence on Competitive Intensity’.

41. Andreff, Scelles, ‘Walter C. Neale 50 Years Later’, 825.

42. It has been assumed that all the prizes in a national championship do not have the same value: the sporting prizes at the top of the standing would be more attractive than the challenge of avoiding relegation. This is the reason why Pawlowski or Kringstad and Gerrard suggested weightings for the European men’s football leagues. The latter authors considered 1 for title, 1/1.5² for direct entry to the Champions League, 1/1.75² for entry to the Champions League qualifying rounds, 1/2² for entry to the Europa Cup (League now) and 1/3² for relegation. Pawlowski, ‘Testing the Uncertainty of Outcome Hypothesis’.

43. Scelles, Desbordes, Durand, ‘Marketing in Sport Leagues’.

44. Scelles et al., ‘Intra-Match Competitive Intensity’.

45. Scelles et al., ‘Competitive Balance vs Competitive Intensity’; ‘My Team is in Contention’; and ‘Do all Sporting Prizes have Significant Positive Impact’.

46. Scelles, ‘Star Quality and Competitive Balance’.

47. Bond and Addesa, ‘TV Demand for the Italian Serie A’; and ‘Competitive Intensity’.

48. Wagner et al., ‘Measuring Competitive Intensity in Sports Leagues’.

49. Scelles et al., ‘Competitive Balance vs Competitive Intensity’.

50. Perin et al., ‘State of the Art of Sports Data Visualization’.

51. Card et al., ‘Readings in Information Visualization’.

52. Fekete et al., ‘The Value of Information’.

53. Scelles, ‘Star Quality and Competitive Balance’.

54. Scelles et al., ‘Competitive Balance versus Competitive Intensity’; ‘My Team is in Contention’; and ‘Do all Sporting Prizes have a Significant Positive Impact’.

55. Falter, Perignon, ‘Demand for Football and Intramatch Winning Probability’.

56. Andreff, Scelles, ‘Walter C. Neale 50 Years Later’.

57. Scelles et al., ‘Competitive Balance vs Competitive Intensity’; ‘My Team is in Contention’; and ‘Do all Sporting Prizes have A Significant Positive Impact’.

58. Scelles et al., ‘My Team is in Contention’; and ‘Do all Sporting Prizes have a Significant Positive Impact’.

59. Scelles et al., ‘Do all Sporting Prizes have a Significant Positive Impact’.

60. Bond and Addesa, ‘Competitive Intensity’.