From football field to global politics, will FIFA discourse help Russia? A critical discourse analysis of headlines

ABSTRACT

This paper examines how the FIFA World Cup 2018 headlines generated by Russia are a means to utilize and apply soft power with the aim to restore Russia’s role as one of the powerful and influential states in the global politics. Analysing the use of evaluative patterns in selected headlines, this paper scrutinizes the socio-historical influences that shape and reinforce nationalist and capitalist ideologies, and hence drive the discourse patterns within the headlines. Governed by the theories of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) and Appraisal Theory, the analysis revealed that the headlines were crafted to help Russia move out of global isolation. This symbolic domination was fulfilled by regaining global legitimacy while surging up nationalism and patriotism through the lexical choices applied in crafting the FIFA discourse. This study provides a model for future analyses of the socio-political and historical influences and contexts of the discourses surrounding global events like FIFA.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1. Osipova, ‘Indigenizing soft power in Russia’, 347; Ludvigsen, ‘Sport Mega-Events and Security’, 1058.

2. Clem, ‘Clearing the Fog of War’1.

3. Crilley and others, ‘Russia Isn’t a Country of Putins’, 137.

4. Nicholson, Sherry and Angela, ‘Negotiating National Identity through Loss’, 545.

5. Nye, ‘Soft Power’, 129.

6. Nye, ‘Public Diplomacy and Soft Power’, 100; Osipova, ‘Indigenizing Soft Power in Russia’, 350.

7. Fairclough, Mulderrig and Wodak, ‘Critical Discourse Analysis’, 358; Fairclough, ‘Language and Power’, 164; van Dijk, ‘Discourse, Context and Cognition’,162; Bourdieu, ‘The Economics of Linguistic Exchange’, 645-68.

8. Pomerantsev, ‘Russia and the Menace of Unreality’, 3.

9. Filimonov and Carpentier, ‘Beyond the state as the “cold monster”, 10.

10. ÓTuathail, ‘Theorizing practical geopolitical reasoning’, 4.

11. Dolinskiy, ‘Why Russia is Losing in its Soft Power Quest’, 1; Feklyunina, ‘Russia’s Attempts at Public Diplomacy’, 23; Lebedenko, ‘Russia’s National Identity and Image-building’, 71.

12. Osipova, ‘Indigenizing soft power in Russia’, 346.

13. Osipova, ‘Indigenizing soft power in Russia’, 347.

14. Meadows and Sayer, ‘The Mexican Sports Car Controversy’, 103.

15. Foucault, ‘Power and Knowledge’, 55.

16. Dubrovskaya and Kozhemyakin, ‘Media Construction of Russia’s International Relations’, 92.

17. Fairclough, Mulderrig and Wodak, ‘Critical Discourse Analysis’, 362; Vaczi, Bairner and Whigham, ‘Sport, Nationalism, and Secessionism in Catalonia and Scotland’, 945; Whigham and Bairner, ‘Analysing Sport Policy and Politics’, 729-730.

18. Fowler, ‘Language in the News’, 233; Jóhannesson, ‘The Politics of Historical Discourse Analysis’, 253.

19. Mano, ‘Synthesizing Support’, 270.

20. Mano, ‘Synthesizing Support’, 273-4.

21. Helsinki Commission Report, ‘2018 World Cup: The Beautiful Game and an Ugly Regime’.

22. Beard, ‘The Language of Sport’, 17.

23. van Dijk and Poell, ‘Understanding Social Media Logic’, 10.

24. van Dijk, ‘Discourse, Context and Cognition’, 162.

25. van Dijk, ‘Discourse, Context and Cognition’, 160.

26. Taiwo, ‘Language, Ideology and Power Relations in Nigerian Newspaper Headlines’, 220.

27. Blom and Hansen, ‘Click Bait’, 90; Pavlik, ‘The Impact of Technology on Journalism’, 225.

28. Taiwo, ‘Language, Ideology and Power Relations in Nigerian Newspaper Headlines’, 218.

29. Choi and Kim, ‘Online News Flow’, 1195.

30. Fairclough, ‘Language and Power’, ix.

31. Fairclough, ‘Language and Power’, 93.

32. Martin and White, ‘The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English’, 45.

33. Fairclough, Mulderrig and Wodak, ‘Critical Discourse Analysis’, 362.

34. Bourdieu, ‘The Economics of Linguistic Exchange’, 650.

35. Fairclough, Mulderrig and Wodak, ‘Critical Discourse Analysis’, 364.

36. Makarychev and Yatsyk, ‘From Sochi – 2014 to FIFA – 2018’, 480.

37. Parker and Adler-Nissen, ‘Picking and Choosing the “Sovereign” Border’, 780.

38. Nye, ‘Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics’, 28.

39. Wloch, ‘UEFA as a New Agent of Global Governance’, 300.

40. Fairclough, Mulderrig and Wodak, ‘Critical Discourse Analysis’, 365.

41. Alabarces and María, ‘Football and Fatherland: The Crisis of National Representation in Argentinean Soccer’, 120; Boyle and Monteiro, ‘A Small Country with a Big Ambition’, 230; Torgler, ‘The Economics of the FIFA Football Worldcup’, 290.

42. Bourdieu, ‘The economics of linguistic exchange’, 652.

43. Bucholtz and Hall, ‘Identity and Interaction’, 587.

44. Fidan and Aras, ‘The Return of Russia-Africa Relations’, 50.

45. Robbie, ‘African Ambassadors to Convene in Wake of Trump’s “Shithole” Outburst’.

46. Stronski, ‘Late to the Party: Russia’s Return to Africa’. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

47. Helsinki Commission Report, ‘2018 World Cup: The Beautiful Game and an Ugly Regime’.

48. Wolfe, ‘World Cup Russia 2018’, 4.

49. Thomans and Wareing, ‘Language, Society and Power’, 11.

50. Triandafyllidou and Wodak, ‘Conceptual and methodological questions in the study of collective identities’, 220.