Publication Cover
Cochlear Implants International
An Interdisciplinary Journal for Implantable Hearing Devices
Volume 18, 2017 - Issue 3
441
Views
27
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original articles

Health-related quality of life outcomes following adult cochlear implantation: A prospective cohort study

, , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 130-135 | Published online: 01 Mar 2017
 

Abstract

Introduction: The benefits of cochlear implantation extend beyond improved speech recognition and into overall health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Several measures of HRQoL, categorized as generic or disease specific, have been used in the cochlear implant literature. The clinical utility of generic HRQoL measures have been reported to be variable by previous investigators. The degree to which HRQoL correlates to speech perception is largely unknown.

Methods: A prospective single-subject design at a large tertiary care center. Self-reported HRQoL was measured at the preoperative and 12-month post-activation test intervals. The measures of HRQoL included a generic form, (Medical Outcome Study Short Form; SF-36), and disease specific form (Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire; NCIQ). Speech recognition was measured at the preoperative, 6- and 12-months post-activation test intervals using the Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) monosyllabic word test.

Results: A total of 61 patients (mean 67 years; range 30–87 years) were included in the final analysis. Average speech recognition on the CNC word test was 10% pre-operatively, and 66.7% at 12-months post-activation. The HRQoL scores improved significantly for seven of the eight subdomains of the NCIQ, and one of the nine domains of the SF-36.

Conclusion: Cochlear implantation significantly improves HRQoL, regardless of age. Disease specific measures, such as the NCIQ, are better able to demonstrate differences in HRQoL compared to general health surveys.

Disclosure statements

Contributors The authors listed all contributed to data collection and final write up of the current manuscript.

Funding Internal departmental funding was utilized without commercial sponsorship or support.

Conflicts of interest None.

Ethics approval This study was approved by Mayo Clinic IRB, #12-001533.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 380.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.