Publication Cover
Cochlear Implants International
An Interdisciplinary Journal for Implantable Hearing Devices
Volume 18, 2017 - Issue 6
699
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Case report

Cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) and behavioural measures of auditory function in a child with a single-sided deafness

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 335-346 | Published online: 19 Sep 2017
 

Abstract

Objectives: To study the changes in behavioural and cortical responses over time in a child with single-sided deafness fitted with a cochlear implant (CI).

Methods: Cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) in noise (+5 dB signal-to-noise ratio) were recorded and auditory skills were assessed using tests of sound localization, spatial speech perception in noise, and self-ratings of auditory abilities (Listening inventory for education, LIFE and Speech, spatial and qualities of hearing questionnaire, SSQ parental version). Measures were obtained prior to and after a CI fitting, including one, six, and 12 months after the CI switch on.

Results: Spatial speech recognition improved over time. At 12 months post-CI, word recognition scores were similar to those of normal hearing children. Signal-to-noise ratios for sentences decreased (i.e. improved) over time post-CI. Sound localization markedly improved at 12 months post-CI compared to baseline. Self-perception of difficulty scores decreased over time. Parental ratings of hearing abilities improved compared to baseline for all subscales. There were changes in the P1–N1–P2 complex at 12 months post-CI, which were clearer frontally across stimuli. Further research is needed to understand the significance of such changes after CI fitting for single-sided deafness.

Conclusion: Although the changes observed could reflect maturational changes, the clinically significant improvement in recognition of speech in noise and improved questionnaire results suggest that the CI was beneficial, consistent with the feedback from the participant.

Disclaimer statements

Contributors None.

Funding None.

Conflicts of interest None.

Ethics approval University of Auckland Human Participants Ethics Committee (reference 9277).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 380.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.