752
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

10 Points of note: Asia and the Nixon Doctrine

Pages 47-70 | Published online: 05 Jul 2019

Abstract

Although the President first enunciated the “Nixon Doctrine” informally on Guam in July 1969, the precise meaning of that doctrine has remained ambiguous ever since. Transcripts of this initial briefing exist, but have never been published and cannot be quoted directly. As Administration supporters explain it, such ambiguity is deliberate and essential; any greater spelling out of American intentions would place the United States in a straight-jacket and prevent it from pursuing a flexible and responsive diplomacy in the future. As some critics see it, the doctrine is little more than a political accordian; the Administration's traveling minstrels, playing by ear, can stretch it out or squeeze it tight depending on their particular audience.

Notes

On the deliberate ambiguity of the doctrine, see, for example, Joseph C. Harsch, Christian Science Monitor, August 29–31 (Weekend Issue), 1970. The accordian metaphor was used by spokesmen for the Democratic Party early in 1970. The most important Presidential statements dealing with the Nixon Doctrine occurred in speeches on July 25 and November 3, 1969, and January 22 and February 18, 1970.

Footnotes

  • 1969. New York Times (1969), November 4.
  • Donovan, James A. , 1970. Militarism, U.S.A. . Scribners; 1970. p. 22.
  • Congressional Quarterly, Inc., 1969. Global Defense: U.S. Military Commitments Abroad . 1969.
  • 1970. New York Times (1970), February 19.
  • 1970. Defense Industry Bulletin (1970), p. 22.
  • 1969. I.F. Stone's Weekly (1969), February 24.
  • 1970. New York Times (1970), July 10.
  • 1970. Defense Industry Bulletin (1970), p. 22.
  • Klare, Michael , 1970. The Great South Asian War , The Nation (1970), March 9.
  • 1970. Defense Industry Bulletin (1970), p. 23.
  • 1970. Defense Industry Bulletin (1970), p. 21.
  • Congressional Quarterly, Inc., 1969. Global Defense: U.S. Military Commitments Abroad . 1969.
  • Klare, Michael , 1970. The Great South Asian War , The Nation (1970), March 9.
  • 1970. Providence Journal (1970), September 25.
  • Rice, Berkeley , 1969. The Cold-War College Think Tanks , The Washington Monthly (1969).
  • 1969. New York Times (1969), May 1.
  • 1969. New York Times (1969), July 6.
  • 1970. Defense Industry Bulletin (1970), p. 12, 17–18.
  • 1970. New York Times (1970), May 15.
  • 1970. New York Times (1970), June 10 and 11.
  • 1969. Congressional Record (1969), November 29.
  • 1970. New York Times (1970), June 10.
  • Klare, , 1970. The Nation (1970), March 9.
  • 1970. New York Times (1970), January 26, June 12, July 10.
  • 1970. New York Times (1970), January 10, 11, 12, 16.
  • 1970. New York Times (1970), January 26.
  • 1968. The Economy of Death . Atheneum; 1968.
  • Klare, Michael , 1970. The Great South Asian War , The Nation (1970), March 9.
  • 1969. I.F. Stone's Weekly (1969), September 22.
  • 1969. Congressional Record (1969), October 16.
  • 1970. Congressional Record (1970), August 17.
  • 1969. Congressional Record (1969), October 16.
  • 1970. Defense Industry Bulletin (1970).
  • 1968. New York Times Book Reviews (1968), July 28.
  • 1970. New York Times (1970), July 6.
  • 1970. Defense Industry Bulletin (1970), p. 42.
  • Barnet, Richard , 1970. Hard Times (1970), May 25–June 1.
  • Smith, Frederic H. , 1960. Nuclear Weapons and Limited War , Air University Quarterly Review XII (1) (1960).
  • Smith, Frederic H. , 1960. Nuclear Weapons and Limited War , Air University Quarterly Review XII (1) (1960), p. 11.
  • Baldwin, Hanson W. , 1968. After Vietnam—What Military Strategy in the Far East? , The New York Times Magazine (1968), June 9.
  • U.S. Senate, Committee on Foreign Relations, 1966. Hearings, Asian Development Bank Act . 1966, 89th Congress, 2nd Session, February 16.
  • Wiley, Peter , 1969. Vietnam and the Pacific Rim Strategy , Leviathan (1969), p. 7.
  • Bell, Peter F. , and Resnick, Stephen A. , 1970. The Contradictions of Post-War Development in Southeast Asia , The Journal of Contemporary Asia I (1) (1970), London.
  • United Nations, 1968. Economic Bulletin for Asia and Far East XVI (1) (1968), p. 569.
  • Myrdal, Gunnar , 1968. Asian Drama: An Inquiry Into the Poverty of Nations . Pantheon; 1968. p. 569.
  • 1970. The Indochina Story . Bantam; 1970, Ch. 31.
  • Shoch, Jim , 1969. Japan: Rising Sun in Asia , Pacific Research & World Empire Telegram I (2) (1969).
  • 1968. Far Eastern Economic Review (1968), July 4.
  • 1970. New York Times (1970), January 3.
  • Bell, Peter F. , and Resnick, Stephen A. , 1970. The Contradictions of Post-War Development in Southeast Asia , The Journal of Contemporary Asia I (1) (1970), London.
  • America in Asia, p. 12.
  • Wiens, Thomas B. , 1970. Seeds of Revolution , Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars II (3) (1970).
  • Durdin, Tillman , 1969. New York Times (1969), November 16.
  • 1970. The Indochina Story . Bantam; 1970, Ch. 25.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.