Abstract
Over the last few decades the number of women becoming pregnant later on in life has markedly increased. Medical experts have raised concerns about the increase in the number of women having babies later, owing to evidence that suggests that advancing maternal age is associated with both a decline in fertility and an increase in health risks to both mother and baby. In recognition of these risks, experts have warned that women should aim to have their children between the ages of twenty and thirty-five. As a consequence, women giving birth past the age of thirty-five have typically been positioned as “older mothers.” In this paper we used a social constructionist thematic analysis in order to analyse how “older mothers” are represented in newspaper articles in the British press. We examined how the topics of “choice” and “risk” are handled in discussions of delayed motherhood, and found that the media position women as wholly responsible for choosing the timing of pregnancy and, as a consequence, as accountable for the associated risks. Moreover, we noted that newspapers also constructed a “right” time for women to become pregnant. As such, we discuss the implications for the ability of women to make real choices surrounding the timing of pregnancy.
Notes
1. Statistics for age of mother at first birth outside marriage are unavailable.
2. While we believe that our rationale for using “Google” as a search tool to collect our data was justified, we wanted to see what kinds of information the general public would find in relation to “older mothers,” we also recognise that our analysis may have been improved by completing a more systematic search using a package such as Lexis Nexis. This may have resulted in a larger data corpus and so would have potentially enabled us to identify a greater number of articles where discussions of choice and risk did not prevail—as it was, these kinds of articles were deviant cases in our data corpus.