Publication Cover
Sex Education
Sexuality, Society and Learning
Volume 21, 2021 - Issue 6
523
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Report

Use of media sources in seeking/receiving sexual health information during adolescence among adults of diverse sexual orientations in a US cohort

, , , ORCID Icon &
Pages 723-731 | Received 02 Jul 2020, Accepted 05 Jan 2021, Published online: 20 Jan 2021
 

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to examine the association between sexual orientation and seeking/receiving sexual and reproductive health (SRH) information from media sources during adolescence. We analysed data from male and female participants (aged 23–35 years) from the U.S.-based Growing Up Today Study (GUTS) in 2016. Sex-stratified, multivariable log-binomial models adjusted for age, cohort and race/ethnicity were used to examine sexual orientation differences in retrospective self-reported seeking/receipt of SRH media information before age 18. Sexual minority (e.g., mostly heterosexual, bisexual, gay) men and women were more likely than same-gender individuals who identified as completely heterosexual to seek/receive SRH information about contraceptive methods (e.g., condom use), sexually transmitted infections, and HIV and AIDS. Although lesbians were more likely than completely heterosexuals to seek/receive SRH information from media about each topic, they were the sexual minority subgroup with the smallest proportion seeking/receiving SRH information. Sexual minorities may passively and/or actively receive SRH information pertaining to a wide range of topics, including skills-based sex education, from media sources more frequently than heterosexuals, which may influence safe-sex decision-making. Lesbians in particular may benefit from media information dissemination focusing on their specific SRH needs, as current media sources do not seem to be well-utilised by this group.

Disclosure statement

No potential competing interest was reported by the authors. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the US National Institutes of Health.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here.

Additional information

Funding

This research was supported by U01 HL145386 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the US National Institutes of Health and grant F32HD100081 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, US National Institutes of Health. Ariella Tabaac was supported by the grant F32HD100081 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, US National Institutes of Health. Brittany Charlton was supported by the American Cancer Society [MRSG CPHPS 130006]. Bryn Austin was supported by grants R01HD057368 and R01HD066963 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, US National Institutes of Health, and by grants T71MC00009 and T76MC00001 from the Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Health Resources and Services Administration, US Department of Health and Human Services. Madina Agénor was supported by grant K01CA234226 from the National Cancer Institute, US National Institutes of Health.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 226.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.