Turkey and EUrope: Identity and Other Crises

Abstract

This article explores the concept of identity in Turkey and how issues associated with it influence Turkish relations with European states, societies, and the European Union (EU). Turkey's internal diversity is often overlooked in favor of more monolithic representations. This diversity has positive and negative dimensions for governance in Turkey and for forces wanting to maintain or regenerate momentum for accession to the EU. In comparison, EUrope is struggling to create a common identity of its own. For some Europeans, Turkey is an external unifier. Although the salience of Turkey–EUrope relations has been relatively muted as the debt crisis overwhelms other political themes, the possibility of Turkey joining the EU stimulates identity-related concerns as much as others about financial transfers.

Acknowledgement

The author wishes to thank the Alexander von Humboldt Stiftung and the Politische Akademie Tutzing.

Notes

Cf. Pietersee, “Traveling Light,” 3–17; Öniş, “Turkey, Europe, and Paradoxes of Identity,” 107–36; Müftüler-Bac. “Through the Looking Glass,” 21–35; Checkel and Katzenstein, European Identity; Prügl and Thiel, Diversity in the European Union.

Sarrazin, Deutschland schafft sich ab: Wie wir unser Land aufs Spiel setzen; Schwarz, Die Sarrazin Debatte.

Şükrü Hanioğlu, A Brief History of the Late Ottoman Empire; Tezcan, “The Second Empire,” 556–72; Aral, “The Idea of Human Rights as Perceived in the Ottoman Empire,” 454–82.

Karabelias, Military Class and Perpetual State Control in Turkey, 10.

Presidency of Religious Affairs, Republic of Turkey. http://www.diyanet.gov.tr/english/default.asp.

Cf. Bora, “Nationalist Discourses in Turkey,” 433–51.

Kentel, “‘Nationalist’ reconstructions in the light of disappearing borders'48–64.

Aktay, “Politics at Home, Politics in the World,” 65.

Yildirim, “Turkey: Time to end state recording of individuals’ religious affiliation” (Forum 18 News Service, Oslo, October 8, 2010).

“All ethnic groups in Turkey are equal, PM says” (Hürriyet Daily News, January 4, 2011).

Heper and Landau, Political Parties and Democracy in Turkey.

Tapper, Islam in modern Turkey: religion, politics and literature in a secular state; Akgün, “Twins or Enemies,” 17–35; Hakan Yavuz and Esposito, Turkish Islam and the Secular State: The Gülen Movement; Cizre, Secular and Islamic Politics in Turkey.

Somer, “Democratization, clashing narratives, and ‘Twin Tolerations’ between Islamic-Conservative and Pro-Secular Actors,” 28–47, 32.

The Constitution of the Republic of Turkey (as amended 17 October 2001). http://www.anayasa.gov.tr/images/loaded/pdf_dosyalari/THE_CONSTITUTION_OF_THE_REPUBLIC_OF_TURKEY.pdf; Somer, “Democratization, clashing narratives,” 39–40.

Parslow, Turkish Political Parties, 7.

Ibid., 9.

Ruby, “Can Secular Democracy Survive in Turkey?” (Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life, May 4, 2007) at http://pewresearch.org/pubs/470/can-secular-democracy-survive-in-turkey.

If accurate, this figure of 38 percent calls into question the common claim that 98 (or even 99) percent of the total population were Muslims, given that 20–25 percent of the electorate are CHP voters.

Akgün, Türkiye'de Seçmen Davranışı, Partiler Sistemi ve Siyasal Güven, 205, cited in Turan, “Unstable Stability,” 326. Multiple choices of identification were possible.

Cf. Salame, Democracy without Democrats?

Yildirim, İnac and Özler, “A Sociological Representation of the Justice and Development Party,” 5–24.

Çinar, “Turkey's present ancien regime and the Justice and Development Party,” 13–27.

Somer, “Democratization, clashing narratives,” 41.

Rabasa and Larrabee, The Rise of Political Islam in Turkey, ix.

Turan, “Unstable Stability,” 319–38.

Strauss, “Erdogan claims victory in Turkish referendum” (Financial Times, September 11, 2010).

Barysch, “What Europeans think about Turkey and why”; Somer, “Democratization, clashing narratives.”

Bahcheli and Noel, “The Justice and Development Party and the Kurdish question,” 101–20.

Çandar, “The Kurdish Question,” 13–19.

Kentel, “‘Nationalist’ reconstructions,” 55.

World Elections, “Turkey Referendum 2010,” at http://welections.wordpress.com/2010/09/14/turkey-referendum-2010/

Zaman, “Turkey's New Opposition Leader: Deciphering Kemal Kilicdaroglu.”

European Commission, Eurobarometer 69, “National Report Turkey, Executive Summary,” 2; International Republican Institute, Turkish Public Opinion Survey, May 8–16, 2010; Jenkins, “Continuity and Change,” 339; PEW, “Turks Downbeat about Their Institutions: Even Military Less Well Regarded.”

European Commission, Eurobarometer 2003.5, Brussels: European Commission (2004).

International Republican Institute, “Turkish Public Opinion Survey”, 40–1.

See www.fethullahgulen.org.

Schiffauer, Nach dem Islamismus; Yukleyen, “State Policies and Islam in Europe,” 445–63; Bundesministerium des Innern, Verfassungsschutzbericht, 264–74.

Simsek, Polvan, and Yesil Serit, “The Mosque as a Divisive Symbol in the Turkish Political Landscape,” 489–508.

“En Turquie, le voile islamique fait sa rentrée universitaire” (Le Figaro, October 18, 2010); “Massenprotest gegen Kopftuch-Erlaubnis” (Die Welt, February 2, 2008); Riley, “The Headscarf ban”; Toksabay and Villelabaitia, “In quiet revolution, Turkey eases headscarf ban” (Reuters, October 17, 2010). http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/10/17/us-turkey-headscarf-idUSTRE69G0DX20101017.

Kselman and Buttigieg, European Christian Democracy.

Freedom House, Freedom in the World.

Kamp, “[Starting up in Turkey] Turkey's top NGO's” (Today's Zaman, March 18, 2009). http://www.todayszaman.com/newsDetail_getNewsById.action?load=detay&link=169902.

“The Turkish Identity” (New York Times, September 11, 2005).

World Elections, “Turkey Referendum 2010” at http://welections.wordpress.com/2010/09/14/turkey-referendum-2010/

“European Stability Initiative” (Islamic Calvinists: Change and Conservatism in Central Anatolia September 19, 2005). http://www.esiweb.org/pdf/esi_document_id_69.pdf.

Ağirdir, “Alevis, Kurds Polarized in Their Views on Turkey's Ruling Party” (Hurriyet Daily News, June 14, 2010). www.hurriyetdailynews.com/n.php?n=alevis-and-the-kurdish-are-bipolar-in-their-view-of-the-political-power-2010-06-14.

Quaisser and Wood, “Die Türkei auf dem Weg nach Europa?” 111–22.

Transparency International, Corruption Perceptions Index.

Kaya, “The Rise and Decline of the Turkish ‘Deep State’,” 99–113; Kavacki, “Turkey's Test with its Deep State,” 83–97; Balci, “A Trajectory of Competing Narratives,” 76–100; Bilefsy, “In Turkey, Trial Casts Wide Net of Mistrust” (New York Times, November 22, 2009); “A Dangerous Place to Be a Journalist” (The Economist, March 10, 2011); Jenkins, “The Fading Masquerade: Ergenekon and the Politics of Justice in Turkey”; Bilefsky and Arsu, “Charges against journalists dim the democratic glow in Turkey” (New York Times, January 4, 2012).

Davutoğlu, “Turkish Foreign Policy and the EU in 2010,” 11–17.

Kentel, “Nationalist’ reconstructions.”

European Commission, Eurobarometer 63, 162.

Wood, “Trapped by ‘Europe’,” 291–300.

Eurobarometer 69, “National Report Turkey.”

European Commission, Eurobarometer 2003.3. Public Opinion in the Candidate Countries. Brussels, European Commission 2003, 11.

Bilefsky, “For Turkey, Lure of Tie to Europe is Fading” (New York Times, December 4, 2011).

Quaisser and Wood, EU Member Turkey? 10.

Karlsson, “Europe Is Not a Christian Union” (Foreign Policy Bulletin, April 4, 2007).

Turkey in Europe: Breaking the Vicious Cycle; Wood and Quaisser, “Turkey's Road to the EU: Political Dynamics, Strategic Context and Implications for Europe,” 147–73.

Turkey in Europe: Breaking the Vicious Cycle, 9–10; cf. Gordon and Taspinar, “Turkey on the Brink,” 58.

Cf. Bora, “Nationalist Discourses.”

“Turkey, Russia worst human rights offenders” (eubusiness.com, January 23, 2008); Council of the European Union, Human Rights and Democracy in the World: Report on EU action—July 2008 to December 2009; Human Rights Watch, World Report 2011, 479–84.

Barysch, “What Europeans Think about Turkey and Why.”

Fuller, The New Turkish Republic: Turkey as a Pivotal State in the Muslim World, 148.

Kaya, “Constructing Communities in the Turkish Diaspora: A Quest for Politics,” 165–81.

Ozyurek, “The Light of the Alevi Fire Was Lit in Germany and then Spread to Turkey,” 248.

European Commission, Progress Report on Turkey.

Grabbe and Ülgen, “The Way Forward for Turkey and the EU.”

Danforth, “Ideology and Pragmatism in Turkish Foreign Policy,” 83–95; Robins, “Turkish Foreign Policy since 2002,” 289–304

Aktay, “Politics at Home, Politics in the World.”

Buck, “Turkey and Israel Clash over Inquiries” (Financial Times, January 23, 2011).

http://www.kultur.gov.tr/EN/belge/2-16377/the-turkish-world.html; Turam, “A Bargain Between the Secular-State and Turkish Islam,” 353–74.

Fuller, The New Turkish Republic, 129–35.

The Constitution of the Republic of Turkey (as amended 17 October 2001), Preamble.

Gordon and Taspinar, “Turkey on the Brink.”

Payne, “Turkey's Path to Europe,” 8–15; Wood and Quaisser, “Turkey's Road,” 172.

Knaus, “Turkey's Friends.”

“Turkey in the EU—What the public thinks” 20 August 2009. www.euractiv.com/en/priorities/turkey-eu-public-thinks/article-171187.

Kentel, “‘Nationalist’ Reconstructions.”

Cf. Delanty, Inventing Europe; Wood, “Building Europe,” 397–416.

Bouckaert and Eynikel, Imagine Europe.

Cerutti and Rudolph, Soul for Europe.

“Plato is not only a Greek thinker, he is our thinker–Davutoglu”. http://www.news.az/articles/turkey/27328.