2,395
Views
40
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Organic and soft materials (colloids, liquid crystals, gel, polymers)

Flexible cellulose and ZnO hybrid nanocomposite and its UV sensing characteristics

, , , , &
Pages 437-446 | Received 13 Feb 2017, Accepted 27 May 2017, Published online: 26 Jun 2017

Abstract

This paper reports the synthesis and UV sensing characteristics of a cellulose and ZnO hybrid nanocomposite (CEZOHN) prepared by exploiting the synergetic effects of ZnO functionality and the renewability of cellulose. Vertically aligned ZnO nanorods were grown well on a flexible cellulose film by direct ZnO seeding and hydrothermal growing processes. The ZnO nanorods have the wurtzite structure and an aspect ratio of 9 ~ 11. Photoresponse of the prepared CEZOHN was evaluated by measuring photocurrent under UV illumination. CEZOHN shows bi-directional, linear and fast photoresponse as a function of UV intensity. Electrode materials, light sources, repeatability, durability and flexibility of the prepared CEZOHN were tested and the photocurrent generation mechanism is discussed. The silver nanowire coating used for electrodes on CEZOHN is compatible with a transparent UV sensor. The prepared CEZOHN is flexible, transparent and biocompatible, and hence can be used for flexible and wearable UV sensors.

1. Introduction

Nowadays, environmentally friendly materials have gained much attention because of pollution, a shortage of resources and industrial waste. Cellulose, a natural polymer material, is a strong candidate for environmentally friendly composite materials because of its merits in terms of its eco-friendly, abundant, biodegradable, renewable and biocompatible characteristics [Citation1,2]. Cellulose has been discovered to be a smart material, namely electro-active paper (EAPap) and various applications of EAPap have been reported, such as energy harvesters, sensors and actuators. EAPap has versatile properties which are useful for a wide range of applications because of its light weight, transparency, flexibility, piezoelectricity, high mechanical strength and biodegradability [Citation2–5]. In order to enhance performance and confer new functionality of EAPap, inorganic nanomaterials have been employed in cellulose composite films. Titanium oxide (TiO2), tin oxide (SnO), iron oxide (Fe2O3), graphene oxide (GO) and carbon nanotube (CNT) were blended/bonded with cellulose to comprise cellulose-based multifunctional composite materials [Citation6–10]. Such multifunctional composite materials enhanced their mechanical and chemical properties, which expanded their applications to gas sensors, biosensors, mechanical reinforced films, energy materials and flexible field effect transistors.

Zinc oxide (ZnO) is an attractive functional nanomaterial with a wide band gap (Eg = 3.4 eV), large free exciton energy (60 meV), piezoelectricity, photoelectrical property and stability. ZnO is an important nanomaterial in electronic and photonic devices. Additionally, ZnO is useful for bio-electronics and the cosmetic industry due to its biocompatibility and environmental friendliness [Citation11–13]. ZnO can be formed as various shapes such as nanorod, nanowire, nanobelt, nanoneedle, nanotube and nanoplate. Depending on the process conditions, they reveal different properties which lead to a wide range of applications [Citation14–19]. Among them, well-grown nanorods are the most promising structure since it shows superior characteristics to others. Many fabrication methods in ZnO grown nanorods are available such as chemical vapor deposition, metal organic chemical vapor deposition, pulsed laser deposition, vapor liquid solid epitaxial, physical vapor deposition and spray pyrolysis [Citation20–24]. Although these methods are well developed and result in a good nanoscale structure, they are complex due to requiring high vacuum, high temperatures and expensive equipment. The aqueous solution-based hydrothermal process has received attention due to the simplicity of the process, low temperature, large-scale fabrication and low cost [Citation25–28].

Recently, nanomaterials have been studied to improve functionality and the properties of polymers, namely organic-inorganic hybrid composites which exhibit the combined synergistic effect of inorganic nanomaterials and organic polymers. With increasing interest in wearable electronics, the demand of organic-inorganic hybrid composites is thus increased. ZnO is an attractive nanomaterial for the hybrid composites because it can be easily grown on various substrates including metal, glass, silicon, sapphire, flexible plastic and polymers [Citation19,29–32]. ZnO-polymer hybrid composites have been developed to bridge the semiconducting properties of ZnO and flexibility of the polymer [Citation26,28–31]. A flexible ZnO energy harvester and nanogenerator can generate electrical energy by large deformation under stretching or compression load due to the substrate flexibility [Citation33,34]. A flexible ZnO strain sensor can be utilized to structure a health monitoring system of arbitrarily shaped structures [Citation35,36]. Polymer-based ZnO thin film transistors, surface acoustic wave devices and dye-sensitized solar cells can be realized by applying flexible electronics [Citation37–39]. ZnO-polymer hybrid composites have been investigated as gas, humidity and UV sensors for wearable electronics [Citation31,40–42]. However, in-depth investigation of UV sensing behavior of flexible, transparent and renewable cellulose-ZnO hybrid nanocomposite (CEZOHN) has not been performed. Furthermore, the UV sensing behavior of ZnO nanorods grown on a cellulose film has not been investigated.

This paper explores fabricating a flexible, transparent and renewable cellulose-ZnO hybrid nanocomposite (CEZOHN) and investigating the UV photoresponse of the prepared CEZOHN in terms of electrode materials, light sources, repeatability, durability and flexibility. Two-step fabrication processes of ZnO nanorods are utilized by direct ZnO seeding and hydrothermal ZnO nanorod growth on the cellulose film. The morphology and structure of grown ZnO nanorods are analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. Optical properties are investigated by measuring photoluminescence (PL) and UV-visible absorption spectra. The UV photoresponse of the CEZOHN is investigated by taking into account the exposure side, light intensity, light source and electrode materials. Repeatability, durability and flexibility of the CEZOHN are investigated and the photocurrent generation mechanism is explained.

2. Experimental details

2.1. Fabrication

Cellulose ZnO nanorod hybrid nanocomposite was prepared in two steps: ZnO seeding and ZnO nanorod growth on a cellulose film. The detailed fabrication process of the cellulose film is reported in the references [Citation2,3]. Briefly, dried cotton pulp (degree of polymerization 4500, Buckeye Technologies Inc., Memphis, TN, USA) was torn into small pieces and then mixed with LiCl in N, N-dimethylacetamide (DMAc, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for dissolving cellulose fiber. A transparent cellulose solution was obtained by heating up to 150 °C while stirring mechanically according to the solvent exchange. The cellulose solution was poured on a glass plate and cast by a doctor blade. A wet cellulose film was obtained after curing by using deionized (DI) water/isopropyl alcohol (IPA) mixture followed by DI water washing for one day. The wet cellulose film was dried on Styrofoam with clamping to maintain its flatness in an ambient condition. The dried cellulose film was fixed on a silicon wafer with Kapton tape. A solvent for the ZnO seeding was prepared by dissolving 50 mM of zinc acetate dihydrate (Zn(CH3COO)2·2H2O, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in ethyl alcohol. The first ZnO seed layer was formed on the surface of the cellulose film by spin coating the solvent, followed by drying at 100 °C. The spin coating was repeated 10 times every 3 minutes to provide a sufficient ZnO seed layer, and then 30 minutes of extra heating was supplied to remove any remnant solvent and residues. For the ZnO growth, another ZnO-derived solvent was prepared by mixing 50 mM of zinc nitrate hexahydrate (Zn(NO3)2·6H2O, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and hexamethylenetetramine (HMT, (CH2)6·N4, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), both dissolved in DI water. When the ZnO seeded cellulose was immersed into the derived solvent at 90 °C for 1 hour, ZnO nanoparticles were grown on ZnO nanorods. After the growth, the film was rinsed and dried on the Styrofoam at room temperature for one day, which resulted in CEZOHN.

2.2. Characterization

The sample morphology was monitored using a field-emission SEM (S-4300, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). An AFM (Dimension-3000, Veeco, Plainview, NY, USA) was employed to analyze the surface morphology and size of the seeds and ZnO nanorods in tapping mode. To investigate the crystal structure of ZnO nanorods, XRD patterns were acquired from thin films using a DMAX-2500 spectrometer (Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan), Cu-Ka radiation, 2θ angle mode and 0.02° step. Optical properties were characterized via UV-visible (8452A, HP, Palo Alto, CA, USA, 190–800 nm range) and FTIR absorption (FTS-3000, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The crystalline structure and morphology were also studied by HRTEM (3010, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). The PL of CEZOHN was measured at - 50 °C using a Maple-I (Dongwoo Optron, Gwangju-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea) with a 325 nm He-Cd laser.

2.3. UV photoresponse test

To evaluate UV photoresponse, platinum electrodes were deposited on both sides of the prepared CEZOHN by using a magnetron sputter (K-575X, EMI Tech, Lewes, England). The electrode size is 1 cm × 4 cm, and a wire was connected to each electrode. The prepared CEZOHN was attached to a flexible and transparent plate and UV light was exposed to the cellulose side or ZnO side of CEZOHN. The UV light lamp (PL-S 9 W/2P BLB, Philips, Amsterdam, Netherlands) was fixed with a standing jig and the intensity of UV light exposure was controlled by the distance to the CEZOHN. The source of the UV lamp was 365 nm wavelength and the power density was measured by using a UV meter (UV-A Meter, Kuhnast, Wachterbach, Germany) which has the highest sensitivity at 360 nm. The CEZOHN was connected to the picoammeter and a pulse analyzer was used to monitor the induced current during the UV light exposure.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Characterization

Morphologies of the prepared CEZOHN were investigated by taking SEM. Figure (a) shows the cross-sectional SEM image of the CEZOHN. High-density ZnO nanorods are shown on the cellulose film vertically and uniformly grown. From the SEM image and the AFM image shown in Figure (b), ZnO nanorods are found to be 1 μm long with a 110 nm diameter. The aspect ratio of ZnO nanorods ranges from 9 to 11. The high aspect ratio of ZnO nanorods is beneficial for electrical properties as it results in the fast movement of charge carriers [Citation43].

Figure 1. Morphology investigation of the prepared CEZOHN: (a) cross-sectional SEM image and (b) AFM surface image.

Figure 1. Morphology investigation of the prepared CEZOHN: (a) cross-sectional SEM image and (b) AFM surface image.

Detailed structural characteristics of the CEZOHN and ZnO nanorods were evaluated by HRTEM. Figure (a) shows the interface boundary between the cellulose film and the ZnO nanorod. ZnO nanorods were grown to the vertical direction on the surface of the cellulose film. Figure (b) shows the TEM image of the ZnO seeding layer on the cellulose film. The seeding layer was formed at the bottom of the ZnO nanorods with a 150 nm thickness. Figure (c) shows a high resolution TEM image of a single ZnO nanorod. From the image the lattice space of ZnO was estimated at 5.2 Å, which corresponds to the (002) planes in the wurtzite structure. The wurtzite structure of ZnO is beneficial to the electrical properties of CEZOHN.

Figure 2. TEM images of (a) the CEZOHN with (b) interface morphology and (c) a high resolution image of a ZnO nanorod.

Figure 2. TEM images of (a) the CEZOHN with (b) interface morphology and (c) a high resolution image of a ZnO nanorod.

In order to further investigate the crystal structure of CEZOHN, XRD measurements were carried out. Figure (a) shows the XRD curves of the CEZOHN. The broad XRD peak around 21° represents a typical characteristic peak of regenerated cellulose, while several diffraction peaks at 31.7°, 34.4° and 36.2° indicate (100), (002), (101) wurtzite crystalline structures of the ZnO nanorod. The highest peak detected at 34.4° indicates that most ZnO nanorods are grown vertically on the cellulose film as followed to (002) plane. To investigate the chemical function groups, FTIR was taken. Figure (b) shows the comparison of FTIR curves between the cellulose film and the CEZOHN. A significant difference is detected at 3370 cm−1, which is assigned to the peak of the hydroxyl group. The prepared CEZOHN shows remarkably low peak intensity at 3370 cm−1 compared to the cellulose film, suggesting that the hydroxyl groups were mostly consumed by a reaction with zinc ion and water molecules during the seeding and growing processes. The peak of chemical bonding with Zn-O is also observed at 420 cm−1, which was not detected from the cellulose film in Figure (c) [Citation44].

Figure 3. (a) XRD patterns and (b), (c) FTIR absorption spectra of CEZOHN and cellulose film.

Figure 3. (a) XRD patterns and (b), (c) FTIR absorption spectra of CEZOHN and cellulose film.

The PL property of the cellulose film and the CEZOHN was taken. Figure (a) shows the PL curves of the cellulose film and CEZOHN. Cellulose film has a broad PL peak at around 550 nm. The PL spectra of CEZOHN show two peaks. The broad peak is detected from 450 to 750 nm, which is deep-level-emission (DLE) range and mainly associated with oxygen vacancies of ZnO [Citation31]. This broad peak is due to the formation of crystal defects made by the low temperature fabrication process. The sharp luminescence peak detected at 373 nm corresponds to the near-band-edge emission (NBE) of ZnO [Citation27,31,45–47]. Note that the PL curve of the CEZOHN is not much influenced by the cellulose film.

Figure 4. (a) PL curves and (b) UV-visible transmittance spectra of cellulose film and CEZOHN.

Figure 4. (a) PL curves and (b) UV-visible transmittance spectra of cellulose film and CEZOHN.

Optical transparency was analyzed by measuring UV-visible spectra of the cellulose film, the ZnO seeded cellulose and the CEZOHN. Figure (b) shows UV-visible spectra in the wavelength between 200 and 800 nm. The UV-visible spectrum of the cellulose film shows good transparency over 85%. Note that the ZnO seeded cellulose film shows transparency less than 85% compared to the cellulose film in visible light range. Below 380 nm, more absorption can be seen from the CEZOHN, which is attributed to the ZnO seed layer. Although most UV light is absorbed by ZnO nanorods, the optical property of the CEZOHN is acceptable in comparison with other organic-inorganic hybrid composites [Citation48–50].

3.2. UV photoresponse

3.2.1. UV intensity effect

The prepared CEZOHN requires conductive electrodes to measure UV-induced electrical response. Various metals such as Al, Au and Pt can be candidates for the electrode deposition and Pt was chosen at first. Figure shows the schematic of the UV photoresponse setup and UV light intensity as a function of distance from the CEZOHN. The UV intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the CEZOHN. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance, and it was varied between 0.2 and 2.6 mW/cm2 by changing the distance in the photoresponse experiments. The induced current increased as UV intensity as shown in Figure . As a function of time, it spiked after exposure to light and then gradually decreased. The peak current values were 1.34, 0.90, 0.70 and 0.40 μA at the power densities of 2.6, 1.5, 0.8 and 0.2 mW/cm2, respectively. Carrier generation in ZnO by UV light is generally explained by a trapping mechanism based on the absorption and desorption of oxygen molecules at the surface [Citation29]. The decrease in current with UV exposure time might be due to a recombination between photon-generated holes and reabsorbed oxygen molecules; this decrease saturates after a few minutes, possibly due to the repeated desorption-reabsorption of oxygen molecules. When the UV light is turned off, the photogeneration of electron-hole pairs is stopped, and only a small fraction of unpaired electrons is reabsorbed by oxygen molecules, resulting in a current decay. Additional factors may contribute to strong current decrease under the UV illumination. For example, some charge carriers may be trapped in pores in the cellulose film.

Figure 5. (a) Schematic of UV photoresponse test setup (b) UV intensity at various distances from the UV source.

Figure 5. (a) Schematic of UV photoresponse test setup (b) UV intensity at various distances from the UV source.

Figure 6. Photocurrent outputs at various UV intensities.

Figure 6. Photocurrent outputs at various UV intensities.

3.2.2. Exposure side effect

The prepared CEZOHN has two different sides: the ZnO nanorods side and the cellulose film side. To verify the effect of UV exposure sides, UV was exposed to the ZnO side and the cellulose side separately. Figure shows the bi-directional photoresponse behavior of the CEZOHN. The cellulose side shows a higher induced current than the ZnO side. ZnO nanorods absorb UV light between 315 and 380 nm wavelength in UV as shown in Figure (b). This range of UV light is almost absorbed by the ZnO nanorods. However, since the CEZOHN has a 120 ~ 150 nm thick seeding layer, only 5 ~ 7% reduction of the transmittance peak at 370 nm was observed on the cellulose side. This phenomenon of the cellulose side resulted in higher current output than the ZnO side. This might also be associated with the low light scattering of the cellulose side. Once light is exposed to the cellulose side, it penetrates through the cellulose film and reaches the ZnO seed layer, which is much smoother than the ZnO nanorods layer, resulting in low scattering. In brief, the induced current with the cellulose side exposure is at least 20% higher than the ZnO side.

Figure 7. Bi-directional photoresponse behavior of the CEZOHN.

Figure 7. Bi-directional photoresponse behavior of the CEZOHN.

3.2.3. Electrode effect

Metal layers are necessary on both sides of the CEZOHN to form electrodes. In order to study the effect of electrodes, Al, Au and Pt were deposited on both sides of the composite. Figure shows the induced current with various metals under UV exposure of 0.7 mW/cm2 intensity. The Pt electrode exhibited a 20% higher current output than the Au case. Note that the Al electrode did not show any photoresponse under UV exposure. This might be associated with work function values of 5.7, 5.2, 4.3 and 4.2 for Pt, Au, ZnO and Al, respectively. The big gap of work function between the electrode and ZnO induces a high photocurrent under UV exposure. Since the work function of Al electrode is almost the same as that of ZnO, the Al electrode did not show any current output.

Figure 8. UV photocurrent for two different electrodes.

Figure 8. UV photocurrent for two different electrodes.

The transparency of CEZOHN exhibits over 65% within a visible light range. It is higher than other organic-inorganic composites in which inorganic particles scatter lights so as to deteriorate its transparency. To apply transparent electronics, a transparent electrode on CEZOHN is made by depositing silver nanowires (AgNWs) using a spray. The AgNWs deposition on the cellulose film has been introduced in previous work [Citation5]. In short, AgNWs (Nanopyxis) were dispersed in isopropyl alcohol (IPA) with 0.5 wt.% concentration. The concentration of AgNWs is controlled by diluting it with IPA. A spray gun (Paasche, H202S) with supporting external pressure control was used with 0.025 ml/cm2 spray volume rate on the cellulose film. The AgNWs electrode was formed in 3 different configurations. The first one is AgNWs electrode deposition on the cellulose side and the ZnO side is a Pt electrode. The second one is AgNWs for the ZnO side and Pt for the cellulose side. The third one is AgNWs electrodes on both sides. Figure displays the induced current values with different electrode configurations. The first, second and third cases exhibited 300, 150 and 80 nA current output, respectively under UV exposure at 0.9 mW/cm2 intensity. There is a wide difference between the first and second cases, which indicates that the high photoresponse performance can be realized with Pt coating on the ZnO side. The average transmittance of the AgNWs where both sides deposited is about 52%. A transparent UV sensor can be realized with a lower concentration of AgNWs, provided the electrical conductivity of the electrode is maintained.

Figure 9. Photoresponse of three UV sensor configurations depicted in the insets.

Figure 9. Photoresponse of three UV sensor configurations depicted in the insets.

3.2.4. Light source effect

The UV portion of sunlight may be split into three components: the UV-C range extends from 100 to 280 nm. UV-C sunlight has a relatively high intensity, but it is entirely absorbed by Earth’s ozone layer. The UV-B range lies between 280 and 320 nm. It is also largely absorbed by the atmosphere, yet prolonged exposure to UV-B light can easily ‘burn’ the human skin. UV-B light cannot penetrate through windows. The wavelength range of UV-A light extends from 320 to 400 nm. This light is not absorbed by the ozone layer; it can penetrate deeply into the human skin, affecting the immune system and potentially causing skin cancer [Citation51,52].

The prepared CEZOHN has a sharp luminescence peak at 373 nm, which means that it can detect UV-A light. Figure shows a comparison of the induced currents under the UV lamp exposure and sunlight. The applied UV is sensitive at UV-A, which has the highest sensitivity at 360 nm. Measured intensities of the UV lamp and sunlight are 1.0 and 0.4 mW/cm2, respectively. Even with the low intensity exposure of sunlight, the photoresponse performance was similar to the UV lamp. The initially induced current under sunlight is lower than the UV lamp case, but it becomes the same after 5 minutes’ exposure. Thus, it is concluded that the CEZOHN can detect UV-A in sunlight.

Figure 10. Photoresponse under sunlight or UV lamp exposure.

Figure 10. Photoresponse under sunlight or UV lamp exposure.

3.2.5. Repeat test and aging effect

Sensors should be fast to respond and reliable. Tests were performed repeatedly in order to investigate these characteristics. The result of a repeated test with cyclic UV exposure is shown in Figure (a). The cyclic exposure was composed of 1 minute UV on and 1 minute off and repeated 4 times in a cycle under 1.3 mW/cm2 intensity UV exposure. The CEZOHN shows a good response time of less than 1 second. The photocurrent was induced clearly with a fast response time under on and off UV exposures. The result proves that the UV sensor made with the CEZOHN has a good repeatability.

Figure 11. (a) Photocurrent under cyclic UV exposure and (b) long-term stability of the UV sensor.

Figure 11. (a) Photocurrent under cyclic UV exposure and (b) long-term stability of the UV sensor.

The durability of sensors is important for real applications. The aging effect is a key issue for durability. The prepared CEZOHN can be influenced by environmental moisture and temperature changes over time. Degree of usage also affects durability. The UV photoresponse of the CEZOHN was observed over a few months as shown in Figure (b). The induced current was 456 nA at first under 0.7 mW/cm2 UV intensity. The photocurrent was reduced to 76% and 62% after 4 and 6 months. After 10 months, the measured photocurrent was 234 nA, at which the performance dropped to 51%, nearly half-life of its initial performance. The UV sensor was kept in room condition without any protecting treatment. Considering this point, 10 months for half-life is quite a long time. As a further durability test, the CEZOHN was maintained even after 18 months and it was found that it maintained the half-life level of the induced current.

3.2.6. Flexibility effect

Recently, flexible electronic devices have been used in wearable electronics. The CEZOHN can detect UV-A from sunlight. So, if it has certain flexibility over the sensing behavior, it may be useful for a wearable UV sensor. Thus, the flexibility test was done by attaching the UV sensor to flexible substrates with different curvatures. Several circular shape plastics were prepared for the flexible substrates. Figure demonstrates the photoresponse of the UV sensor with flat and 4, 3 and 2 cm diameter circular substrates. For a reference condition, the flat substrate was used first with a fixed UV intensity of 1.5 mW/cm2. Figure (a) reveals the highest saturated induced current of 1.54 μA for the flat substrate. From the flexible substrate test, a 4 cm diameter circular substrate showed an induced current of 1.46 μA, which is similar to the flat substrate case as shown in Figure (b). This phenomenon is due to the size of the active exposure zone, of which the electrode size is 4 cm × 1 cm. So, the bent UV sensor on the 4 cm diameter cylinder has UV exposed to the whole active exposure zone, albeit the loss of projected zone was only due to the curvature. The induced currents are 1.22 μA and 0.98 μA for 3 and 2 cm diameter circular substrates, respectively. The induced current decreases as the diameter of the circular substrate decreases owing to an increased loss of projected zone by the UV exposure. The CEZOHN can be applied for a wearable UV sensor.

Figure 12. Photoresponse behavior of the UV sensor with (a) flat and (b) 4 cm, (c) 3 cm, (d) 2 cm diameter circular substrates.

Figure 12. Photoresponse behavior of the UV sensor with (a) flat and (b) 4 cm, (c) 3 cm, (d) 2 cm diameter circular substrates.

4. Conclusions

We have fabricated a cellulose-ZnO hybrid nanocomposite (CEZOHN) consisting of vertically aligned ZnO nanorods on the surface of cellulose film. The nanorods had the wurtzite structure and an aspect ratio of 9 ~ 11. CEZOHN was coated with electrodes for UV sensing characterization. It showed a sharp photoluminescence peak at 373 nm. The photocurrent in CEZOHN increased linearly with an intensity increase of UV light. CEZOHN exhibited bi-directional photoresponse behavior, and the cellulose side induced 20% more current than the ZnO side. The Pt electrode resulted in the highest photocurrent owing to its large work function difference with ZnO. The use of AgNWs transparent electrode with CEZOHN opened a possibility for a transparent UV sensor, which was responsive to sunlight and exhibited a short response time under repeated UV exposure. Flexibility and aging tests proved that the CEZOHN can be used for a wearable sensor that detects the UV component of sunlight with high sensitivity and stability. The sensor exploits the advantages of cellulose in terms of flexibility, low price, sustainability and transparency.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Funding

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [grant number NRF-2015R1A3A2066301].

References

  • Kim J-H, Shim BS, Kim HS, et al. Review of nanocellulose for sustainable future materials. Int J Precis Eng Manuf Green Technol. 2015;2:197–213. 10.1007/s40684-015-0024-9
  • Kim J, Yun S, Ounaies Z. Discovery of cellulose as a smart material. Macromolecules. 2006;39:4202–4206. 10.1021/ma060261e
  • Yun S, Jang SD, Yun GY, et al. Electrically aligned cellulose film for electro-active paper and its piezoelectricity. Smart Mater Struct. 2009;18:117001.
  • Kim J-H, Mun S, Ko H–U, et al. Disposal chemical sensor and biosensors made on cellulose paper. Nanotechnology. 2009;25:092001.
  • Mun S, Zhai L, Min SK, et al. Flexible and transparent strain sensor made with silver nanowire–coated cellulose. J Intel Mat Syst Str. 2016;27:1011–1018. Doi:10.1177/1045389X15577651
  • Kafy A, Sadasivuni KK, Kim H-C, et al. Designing flexible energy and memory storage materials using cellulose modified graphene oxide nanocomposites. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2015;17:5923–5931. 10.1039/C4CP05921B
  • Yun S, Jang SD, Yun GY, et al. Paper transistor made with covalently bonded multiwall carbon nanotube and cellulose. Appl Phys Lett. 2009;95:104102.
  • Yadav M, Mun S, Hyun J, et al. Synthesis and characterization of iron oxide/cellulose nanocomposite film Int. J Biol Macromol. 2015;74:142–149. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.11.042
  • Mun S, Chen Y, Kim J. Cellulose-titanium dioxide-multiwalled carbon nanotube hybrid nanocomposite and its ammonia gas sensing properties at room temperature Sens. Actuator B-Chem. 2012;171-172:1186–1191. 10.1016/j.snb.2012.06.066
  • Mahadeva SK, Kim J. Conductometric glucose biosensor made with cellulose and tin oxide hybrid nanocomposite Sens. Actuator B-Chem. 2011;157:177–182. 10.1016/j.snb.2011.03.046
  • Tian ZR, Voigt JA, Liu J, et al. Complex and oriented ZnO nanostructures Nat. Mater. 2003;2:821–826.
  • Morganti P. Use and potential of nanotechnology in cosmetic dermatology Clin. Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2010;3:5–13. 10.2147/CCID
  • Kuo CL, Wang CL, Ko HH, et al. Synthesis of zinc oxide nanocrystalline powders for cosmetic applications Ceram. Int. 2010;36(2):693–698.
  • Wang XJ, Sun XW, Yang Y, et al. Hydrothermally grown oriented ZnO nanorod arrays for gas sensing applications. Nanotechnology. 2006;17:4995–4998. 10.1088/0957-4484/17/19/037
  • Park KT, Xia SW, Kim SB, et al. Facile synthesis of ultrathin ZnO nanotubes with well-organized hexagonal nanowalls and sealed layouts: applications for lithium ion battery anodes. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2013;117:1037–1043. 10.1021/jp310428r
  • Wang X, Song J, Wang ZL. Single-crystal nanocastles of ZnO Mater. Phys. Lett. 2006;424:86–89.
  • Jing Z, Zhan J. Fabrication and gas-sensing properties of porous ZnO nanoplates Adv. Mater. 2008;20:4547–4551.
  • Jeong HW, Choi S-Y, Hong SH, et al. Shape-dependent charge transfers in crystalline ZnO photocatalysts: rods versus plates. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2014;118:21331–21338. 10.1021/jp506032f
  • Özgür Ü, Alivov Y, Liu C, et al. Comprehensive review of ZnO materials and device. J. App. Phys. 2005;98:041301.
  • Xu L, Li X, Zhan Z, et al. Catalyst-free, selective growth of ZnO nanowires on SiO2 by Chemical vapor deposition for transfer-free fabrication of UV photodetectors ACS. Appl Mater Inter. 2015;7:20264–20271. 10.1021/acsami.5b05811
  • Jia C, Chen Y, Liu G, et al. Growth of c-oriented ZnO films on (001) SrTiO3 substrates by MOCVD. J Cryst Growth. 2008;311(1):200–204. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2008.10.017
  • Sun Y, Fuge GM, Ashfold MNR. Growth of aligned ZnO nanorod arrays by catalyst-free pulsed laser deposition methods Chem. Phys Lett. 2004;396:21–26.
  • Huang MH, Wu Y, Fetick H, et al. Catalytic growth of zinc oxide nanowires by vapor transport Adv. Mater. 2001;13(2):113–116.
  • Rao TP, Santhoshkumar MC. Effect of thickness on structural, optical and electrical properties of nanostructured ZnO thin films by spray pyrolysis Appl. Surf Sci. 2009;255(8):4579–4584.
  • Sun X, Huang J, Wang J, et al. A ZnO nanorod inorganic/organic heterostructure light-emitting diode emitting at 342 nm. Nano Lett. 2008;8(4):1219–1223. 10.1021/nl080340z
  • Chen Q, Shi S, Zhang W. Study on luminescence characteristic of ZnO/polymer hybrid films. Colloid Pol Sci. 2009;287:533–540. 10.1007/s00396-009-1999-y
  • Hatch S, Briscoe J, Dunn S. A self-powered ZnO-nanorod/CuSCN UV Photodetector exhibiting rapid response Adv. Mat. 2013;25(6):867–871.
  • Manekkathodi A, Lu MY, Wang CW, et al. Direct growth of aligned zinc oxide nanorods on paper substrates for low-cost flexible electronics Adv. Mater. 2010;22:4059–4063.
  • Li Y, Valle F, Simonnet M, et al. Competitive surface effects of oxygen and water on UV photoresponse of ZnO nanowires Appl. Phys Lett. 2009;94(2):023110.
  • Zhou Z, Zhao Y, Cai Z. Low-temperature growth of ZnO nanorods on PET fabrics with two-step hydrothermal methods Appl. Surf Sci. 2010;256:4724–4728. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.02.081
  • Yao I, Tseng T, Lin P. ZnO nanorods grown on polymer substrates as UV photodetectors Sens. Actuator A-Phys. 2012;178:26–31. 10.1016/j.sna.2012.01.045
  • Ladanov M, Ram M, Matthews G, et al. Structure and opto-electorchemical properties of ZnO nanowires grown on n-Si substrate. Langmuir. 2011;27:9012–9017. 10.1021/la200584j
  • Hu Y, Lin L, Zhang Y, et al. Replacing a battery by a nanogenerator with 20 V output Adv. Mater. 2012;24:110–114.
  • Mun S, Ko H-U, Zhai L, et al. Enhanced electromechanical behavior of cellulose film by ZnO nanocoating and its vibration energy harvesting. Acta Mater. 2016;114:1–6.
  • Gullapalli H, Vemuru VSM, Kumar A, et al. Flexible piezoelectric ZnO-paper nanocomposite strain sensor. Small. 2010;6:1641–1646. 10.1002/smll.v6:15
  • Ko H-U, Mun S, Min S-K, et al. Fabrication of cellulose ZnO Hybrid Nanocomposite and its strain sensing behavior. Materials. 2014;7:7000–7009.
  • Jung Y, Jun T, Kim A, et al. Direct photopatternable organic–inorganic hybrid gate dielectric for solution-processed flexible ZnO thin film transistors. J Mater Chem. 2011;21:11879. 10.1039/c1jm10791g
  • Zhou J, He Z, Jin H, et al. Crystalline structure effect on the performance of flexible ZnO/polyimide surface acoustic wave devices. J Appl Phys. 2013;114:044502. 10.1063/1.4816002
  • Nirmal Peiris TAN, Alessa H, Sagu JS, et al. Effect of ZnO seed layer thickness on hierarchical ZnO nanorod growth on flexible substrates for application in dye-sensitised solar cells. J. Nanopart. Res. 2013;15:333. 10.1007/s11051-013-2115-2
  • Yi J, Lee JM, Park WI. Vertically aligned ZnO nanorods and graphene hybrid architectures for high-sensitive flexible gas sensors Sens. Actuator B-Chem. 2011;155:264–269. 10.1016/j.snb.2010.12.033
  • Hsueh HT, Hsueh TJ, Chang SJ, et al. A Flexible ZnO nanowire-based humidity sensor IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 2012;11(3):520–525.
  • Faure B, Salazar-Alvarez G, Ahniyaz A, et al. Dispersion and surface functionalization of oxide nanoparticles for transparent photocatalytic and UV-protecting coatings and sunscreens Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2013;14:023001. 10.1088/1468-6996/14/2/023001
  • Zhang X, Qin J, Xue Y, et al. Effect of aspect ratio and surface defects on the photocatalytic activity of ZnO nanorods Sci. Rep. 2014;4:4596.
  • Shah AH, Manikandan E, Basheer-Ahmed M, et al. Enhanced bioactivity of Ag/ZnO nanorods-A comparative antibacterial study. J. Nanomed. Nanotechol. 2103;4(3):1000168.
  • Pauporté T, Jouanno E, Pellé F, et al. Key growth parameters for the electrodeposition of ZnO films with an intense UV-light emission at room temperature. J Phys Chem C. 2009;113:10422–10431. 10.1021/jp9010179
  • Gonçalves G, Marques P, Neto CP, et al. Growth, structural, and optical characterization of ZnO-coated cellulosic fibers Cryst. Growth Des. 2009;9(1):386–390. 10.1021/cg800596z
  • Zainelabdin A, Zaman S, Amin G, et al. Stable white light electroluminescence from highly flexible polymer/ZnO nanorods hybrid heterojunction grown at 50 & #xB0;C. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2010;5:1442–1448.
  • Kim DY, Lee S, Lin Z, et al. High temperature processed ZnO nanorods using flexible and transparent mica substrates for dye-sensitized solar cells and piezoelectric nanogenerators. Nano Energy. 2014;9:101–111. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.07.004
  • Ong WL, Low QX, Huang W, et al. Patterned growth of vertically-aligned ZnO nanorods on a flexible platform for feasible transparent and conformable electronics applications. J. Mater. Chem. 2012;22:8518–8524. 10.1039/c2jm00027j
  • Zheng ZQ, Yao JD, Wang B, et al. Light-controlling, flexible and transparent ethanol gas sensor based on ZnO nanoparticles for wearable devices Sci. Rep. 2015;5:11070.
  • Jablonski NG, Chaplin G. Human skin pigmentation as an adaptation to UV radiation Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010;107:8962–8968. 10.1073/pnas.0914628107
  • Narayanan DL, Saladi RN, Fox JL. Ultraviolet radiation and skin cancer Inter. J. Dermatol. 2010;49:978–986.