Abstract
Trading volume is one of the key measures of trading activity intensity and plays a crucial role in the financial market microstructure literature. In this paper, we examine the out-of-sample point and density forecasting performance of Bayesian Autoregressive Conditional Volume (ACV) models for intra-day volume data. Based on 5-min traded volume data for stocks quoted on the Warsaw Stock Exchange, a leading stock market in Central and Eastern Europe, we find that, in terms of point forecasts, the considered linear ACV models significantly outperform benchmarks such as the naïve and Rolling Means methods but not necessarily Autoregressive Moving Average (ARMA) models. Moreover, the point forecasts obtained within the exponential error ACV model are significantly superior to those calculated in other competing structures for which Burr or generalized gamma distributions are specified. The main finding from the analysis of density forecasts is that, in many cases, the linear ACV models with the Burr and generalized gamma distributions provide significantly better density forecasts than the linear ACV model with exponential innovations and the ARMA models in terms of the log-predictive score, calibration and sharpness.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank the participants of the Forecasting Financial Markets Conferences for helpful comments. I gratefully acknowledge and thank the two anonymous reviewers for their critical and useful remarks and suggestions. I am also grateful to Georgios Sermpinis from the University of Glasgow for his insightful suggestions and valuable advice.
Notes
1 Point forecasts are also examined by means of the MAFEs. For the sake of space, results are not presented here and are available upon request.