Corrigendum

This article refers to:

Strange new world: Being a professional and the professional doctorate in the twenty-first century

Wadham, B., & Parkin, N. (2017). Strange new world: Being a professional and the professional doctorate in the twenty-first century. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2017.1371627

When the above article was first published online there were several changes to be made throughout the article by the authors.

1. Abstract line 7: ‘neo liberal’ should be ‘neoliberal’

2. Page 2 line 8: ‘neo liberal’ should be ‘neoliberal’

3. Page 2 line 38: ‘Phd’ should be ‘PhD’

4. Page 3 line 39: no end punctuation after ‘traditions’

5. Page 3 line 40: The paragraph ‘So what is…’ should be run on to the Ben’s conversation

6. Page 4 line 4: ‘52’ after ‘expertise’ should be deleted

7. Page 5 line 1: An end quotation mark ‘ ’ ’ after ‘improvisation’

8. Page 5 line 12: The paragraph ‘The feel for…’ should be run on to the Ben’s conversation

9. Page 5 line 20: ‘neo liberalist’ should be ‘neoliberalist’

10. Page 5 line 46: The double quote mark ‘ “ ’ should be changed to single quote mark ‘ ‘ ’

11. Page 5 line 46: The quote ‘carefulness, thoughtfulness, humility, criticality, receptiveness, resilience, courage and stillness’ should be italicized

12. Page 6 line 3: The quote ‘Professionals are being required…’ should be indent with respect to the previous conversation

13. Page 6 line 6: The paragraph ‘Maintaining a certain…’ is the continuation of the Nicola’s conversation

14. Page 6 line 34: ‘Professional Doctorate’ should be ‘professional doctorate’

15. Page 6 line 38: ‘March’ should be ‘march’

16. Page 6 line 39: ‘neo liberal’ should be ‘neoliberal’

17. Page 6 line 40: The paragraph ‘In the Doctor…’ should be the continuation of the Ben’s conversation

18. Page 6 line 49: ‘Education Doctorate’ should be ‘education doctorate’

19. Page 8 line 11: ‘neo liberal’ should be ‘neoliberal’

20. Page 8 line 12: ‘practitioner scholar’ should be ‘practitioner/scholar’

21. Page 8 line 30: ‘neo liberal’ should be ‘neoliberal’

This has now been amended and the updated version is published online.

The authors apologize for the error.