Publication Cover
Rural Theology
International, Ecumenical and Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Volume 22, 2024 - Issue 1
19
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Rural Shame Orientation: A Matter of Conscience

ORCID Icon
Pages 17-29 | Published online: 26 Feb 2024
 

ABSTRACT

In recent years, there has been a considerable amount of missiological literature that has raised interest in assessing a culture’s level of shame orientation. Beyond implications for gospel proclamation, shame orientation has a dramatic influence on pedagogy as well as leadership methodology. However, there has been a dearth of research in regard to the shame orientation of specific subcultures and the subsequent impact on contextualised missiology. This article provides a review of literature to demonstrate that a pronounced shame orientation of rural subcultures is conceptually plausible. The contribution of this writing is to provide a more specific understanding of the rural subculture and to introduce a methodology of assessing shame orientation of rural subcultures. Further, the article maintains that rural ministry practitioners should be more intentional about the use of available resources that provide nuanced approaches to gospel proclamation, pedagogy, and leadership methodology in shame-oriented cultures.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1 A definition of shame-oriented cultures that reflects the manifestation of the conscience in a collectivist setting is: ‘persons belonging to a group from which a member has infringed on the rules of society will feel ashamed, based on a sense of collective obligation. Shame is social in nature, whereas guilt is individual … ’ (Hofstede et al., Citation2010, p. 110). In order to avoid overgeneralisation that can be attributed to Hofstede, Hofstede, and Minkov, it is important to note the variability between contexts and conscience orientations. As Wiher maintains, ‘Shame does not equal shame, and guilt does not equal guilt in different contexts. Shame-oriented consciences conceive of shame and guilt differently than guilt-oriented consciences. Additionally, shame and guilt are more different in a shame-oriented context than in a guilt-oriented culture’ (Citation2003, p. 132).

2 From 2001 to 2003, the suicide death rate per 100,000 in large metropolitan areas was 11.19 and the rate in nonmetropolitan was 15.50 per 100,000 (United States Department of Health and Human Services, Citation2017, p. 3).

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Carl P. Greene

Carl P. Greene is an Instructor in the Intercultural Studies Department of Trinity International University, Deerfield, IL, USA, and serves as the Executive Director of the SDB General Conference of USA and Canada, Janesville, WI, USA.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 229.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.