893
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Drug Evaluation

Pembrolizumab for the treatment of cervical cancer

, &
Pages 871-877 | Received 22 Feb 2019, Accepted 18 Jul 2019, Published online: 23 Jul 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The prognosis of patients with recurrent and/or metastatic cervical cancer remains poor, with a 5-year survival rate of 17%. Most of cervical cancers are associated with the human papillomavirus (HPV) infection that leads to viral antigens production, supporting the development of immunotherapy in cervical cancer.

Areas covered: Here we report the pharmacologic properties, clinical efficacy, and safety profile of pembrolizumab, an IgG4-kappa humanized monoclonal antibody against the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) receptor, for the treatment of cervical cancer.

Expert opinion: Single agent pembrolizumab has limited efficacy in the recurrent and/or metastatic setting in an unselected patient population. However, durable responses in PD-L1-expressing cervical cancer patients led the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to grant accelerated approval of pembrolizumab in this patient population. Outside this patient population, further development involves combinations with other treatment options including chemotherapy, radiotherapy and other immunotherapeutic agents. The identification of biomarkers of efficacy beyond PD-L1 expression will be essential in order to identify patients who will most likely benefit from pembrolizumab.

Box 1. Drug Summary.

Article Highlights

  • Evidence-based data regarding cervical cancer and checkpoint blockade are scarce and preliminary.

  • Pembrolizumab has been approved in PD-L1-positive cervical cancer patients based on sustained responses.

  • Combinations of pembrolizumab with chemoradiation and in earlier disease stages are being evaluated.

The identification of biomarkers of efficacy beyond PD-L1 expression is urgently needed.

This box summarizes key points contained in the article.

Declaration of interest

C Le Tourneau has participated in advisory boards from BMS, MSD, Merck Serono, Amgen, GSK, Roche, Astra Zeneca, and Nanobiotix. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

Reviewer Disclosures

Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial relationships or otherwise to disclose.

Additional information

Funding

This paper is not funded.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 99.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 960.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.