![Sample our Bioscience journals, sign in here to start your access, Latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5925/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Bioscience.jpg"})
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The treatment of poor prognosis chemotherapy naïve or relapsed testicular cancer is challenging. In poor prognosis treatment naïve disease, the outlook for patients with standard approaches utilising three weekly cisplatin based regimens, most commonly bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin (BEP) is suboptimal, and one can expect more than half of patients to relapse or progress and need salvage treatment. Recent randomised studies have lent weight to the use of dose intensified treatments in these selected patient groups. In relapsed testicular cancer, post platinum based chemotherapy controversy exists as to the optimum relapse regimen as significant cure rates can be expected by re-treating with both conventional dose and high dose or dose intense regimens.
Areas covered: This review seeks to outline the evidence for alternative approaches beyond standard three weekly cisplatin based regimens in poor risk metastatic disease. It also explores the evidence available for selection between conventional dose and high dose strategies on relapse.
Expert commentary: An overview of the data is presented to support personalising therapy selection in both poor risk and relapsed metastatic germ cell tumors.
Declaration of interest
The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties. Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.