824
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Cannabis and multiple sclerosis

, &
Pages 849-854 | Received 06 Apr 2020, Accepted 28 May 2020, Published online: 18 Jun 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Introduction

Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) may suffer from spasticity and pain during their disease course. Baclofen, dantrolene, diazepam and gabapentin have been used as first-line options to treat these conditions, with modest results. Medical use of marijuana smoking has bypassed traditional clinical trials and has been legalized as a therapeutic option for MS-related spasticity and pain in some countries. Cannabis-derived drugs have been tested and approved for medical use.

Areas covered

With the development of nabiximols by the pharmaceutical industry, more countries have made it possible for patients with MS to have legal access to cannabis-related therapies. The evidence-based data on nabiximols and MS-related spasticity, pain, and urinary symptoms is consistent. There are over 7,500 patients reported in 33 studies (12 from the United Kingdom and 11 from Italy).

Expert opinion

Nabiximols is safe and effective for patients with MS whose spasticity could not be treated with the first-line oral drugs. At present, legislation, bureaucracy and costs involved in prescribing this drug limit the experience of neurologists from many countries. There is no scientific evidence that smoking marijuana can be beneficial to patients with MS.

Article highlights

  • Spasticity associated with MS is difficult to treat and may cause pain.

  • Marijuana smoking has not been studied as a possible treatment in MS.

  • Among cannabis products, nabiximols has been approved for MS.

  • Nabiximols is an effective and safe treatment for MS-related spasticity.

Declaration of interest

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Reviewer disclosures

Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Additional information

Funding

This paper was not funded.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 99.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 651.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.