ABSTRACT
Introduction: Attaining optimal glycemic targets in patients with type 2 diabetes is often hard and compromised by the shortcomings of the several treatments.
Areas covered: When glycemic levels are not adequately controlled, an association of GLP-1 receptor agonists and insulin therapy can be adopted. In order to assess the benefit/risk profile of this combination therapy, a literature search of randomized clinical trials was performed.Eighteen trials matched the inclusion criteria. In 10 studies, GLP-1 receptor agonists were added on to an existing regimen, whereas insulin added to an existing GLP-1 receptor agonists regimen occurred in 2 studies. Six studies compared GLP-1 receptor agonists with short acting insulin as a treatment strategy to intensify basal insulin therapy.
Expert opinion: Clinical trials herein reviewed demonstrated the safety and the efficacy of combining GLP-1 receptor agonists with basal insulin, with most studies showing equal or slightly superior efficacy, as compared with the addition of prandial insulin, associated with weight loss and less hypoglycemia.
Article highlights
GLP-1 RAs and insulin act by complementary modes of action, exerting potential benefits on weight and reduction of hypoglycemia.
Several clinical trials herein reviewed showed efficacy and safety of the combination therapy GLP-1RAs – insulin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.
GLP-1 RA added to a pre-existing basal insulin therapy is the most common option emerged in clinical trials. This therapeutic strategy allows to reduce the progressive need of insulin doses and promotes a better compliance of the patients.
Longer studies are needed to assess the long-term efficacy and tolerability of this combination before it can be favored as standard of care for patients with type 2 diabetes failing basal insulin therapy.
This box summarizes key points contained in the article.
Declaration of interest
The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.