ABSTRACT
Objectives
This study was aimed to analyze the effects of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin and different lipid-lowering intensity treatments on exercise tolerance in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD).
Methods
A retrospective analysis was conducted in 549 patients with CHD who underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) from February 2014 to August 2018. The CPET results of patients taking different types and doses of statins were compared from baseline to follow-up.
Results
No significant difference was found in baseline VO2peak between the rosuvastatin group and the atorvastatin group. The VO2peak growth of the rosuvastatin group was significantly greater than that of the atorvastatin group after treatment [1.52 ± 4.03 ml/kg/min vs 0.90 ml/kg/min (−1.60, 3.45), p = 0.018]. Multivariate analysis showed that atorvastatin was a negative independent influencing factor of ΔVO2peak (B = −0.665, SE = 0.321, t = −2.070, p = 0.039, 95% CI: – 1.295~-0.034). There was no significant difference between the median intensity and high-intensity lipid-lowering groups in parameters of CPET.
Conclusions
The exercise tolerance improvement was more considerable for patients with CHD taking rosuvastatin compared with those taking atorvastatin. The lipid-lowering intensity of statins was not independently associated with changes in exercise tolerance in patients with CHD.
Author contributions
Conception and design: Wei Gao, Wei Zhao and Shunlin Xu. Analysis and interpretation of the data: Dan Liu, Tao Shen, Chuan Ren, Lequn Zhou, Jin Bai and Nan Li. Drafting of the paper: Dan Liu and Tao Shen. Revising it critically for intellectual content: Wei Zhao and Wei Gao. Final approval of the version to be published: Wei Gao.
Declaration of interest
The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.
Reviewer disclosures
Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.