ABSTRACT
Background
In recent years, zolpidem has been the subject of numerous reports of misuse, abuse and dependence. In view of these risks, the French drug agency decreed the implementation of secure prescription pads in April, 2017. The objective of this study was to characterize the impact of this regulatory change on the patterns of zolpidem use.
Research design and methods
We included patients with at least one reimbursement for zolpidem before and/or after the regulatory change using a sample of the French health insurance database. For each period, we identified profiles of users using a latent class analysis (LCA).
Results
In total, 15,550 zolpidem users were identified before the measure and 8,301 after the measure. We identified the same three profiles of zolpidem users before and after the measure: non-problematic users (the most prevalent), users whose drug prescriptions suggest psychiatric disorder and potential problematic users. The profile of potential problematic users was similar after the regulatory change but represented a lower absolute number of patients.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the regulatory change had a positive impact on the patterns of zolpidem use, but the impact should be reevaluated, because withdrawal can take a long time, especially in long-term users.
Trial registration
The study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov under the reference number NCT03584542.
Declaration of interests
The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.
Reviewer disclosures
Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.
Authors’ contributions
Conception or design of the work: M Istvan, C Victorri-Vigneau. Acquisition and analysis: M Istvan. Interpretation of data for the work: all authors. Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content: all authors. Final approval of the version to be published: all authors.