194
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Safety of romiplostim and eltrombopag for children with immune thrombocytopenia: a pharmacovigilance study of the FDA adverse event reporting system database

ORCID Icon, , , , , , & show all
Pages 707-714 | Received 16 Sep 2022, Accepted 13 Feb 2023, Published online: 23 Feb 2023
 

ABSTRACT

Background

Romiplostim and eltrombopag are thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPORAs) that have been approved by the FDA on 22 August 2008 and 20 November 2008 for pediatric immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). However, postmarketing pharmacovigilance of TPORAs in children still attracts much attention. We aimed to evaluate the safety of the TPORAs romiplostim and eltrombopag using data from the Adverse Event Reporting System database of FDA (FAERS).

Research design and methods

We conducted a disproportionality analysis and analyzed data from the FAERS database to characterize the key features of adverse events (AEs) associated with TPO-RAs approved for children under 18 years of age.

Results

Since their approval in the market in 2008, 250 and 298 reports of romiplostim and eltrombopag use in children have been published in the FAERS database, respectively. The most frequent AE associated with romiplostim and eltrombopag was epistaxis. Neutralizing antibodies and vitreous opacities showed the strongest signals for romiplostim and eltrombopag, respectively.

Conclusions

The labeled AEs for romiplostim and eltrombopag in children were analyzed. Unlabeled AEs may reflect the potential of new clinical individuals. Early recognition and management of AEs that appear in children treated with romiplostim and eltrombopag are of key importance in clinical practice.

Declaration of interests

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Reviewer disclosures

Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Author contributions

Q Fang and F Huang drafted the original writing of the manuscript and contributed to data analysis and curation. M Zhang, X Wu and W Luo contributed to the concept and design of the study. J Liang and Y Chen performed the data curation. C Li contributed to data extraction. All authors have participated in the review and editing of the final manuscript.

Ethics approval

Anonymized data were collected from a publicly available database and did not require approval from the ethics committee.

Availability of data

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the FAERS database.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2023.2182288.

Additional information

Funding

This paper was not funded.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 99.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 752.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.