An update on the safety of lanreotide autogel for the treatment of patients with neuroendocrine tumors

ABSTRACT

Introduction

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a rare group of tumors originating from neuroendocrine cells in various organs. They include neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), which differ in biological behavior and prognosis. NETs are usually well-differentiated and slow-growing, while NECs are poorly differentiated and more aggressive. Management of NETs often involves somatostatin analogs like octreotide and lanreotide to control tumor growth and alleviate symptoms, especially in well-differentiated NETs. Lanreotide is used to control tumor growth, and both lanreotide and octreotide alleviate symptoms. Treatment approaches may vary depending on the specific type and grade of the neuroendocrine neoplasm.

Areas Covered

This review provides an update on the safety of lanreotide autogel in treating patients with NETs, through a comprehensive review of clinical trials, post-marketing surveillance, real-world evidence, and its safety profile. Specific adverse events, side effects, and potential risks associated with lanreotide autogel are discussed, along with risk mitigation strategies and recommendations for patient monitoring.

Expert Opinion

The findings highlight the overall safety of lanreotide autogel in managing NETs, focusing on its efficacy in controlling hormone secretion, tumor progression, and symptom management. New safety concerns and precautions are also addressed to help healthcare providers make informed decisions when prescribing lanreotide autogel.

KEYWORDS:

• Lanreotide autogel
• neuroendocrine tumors
• drug safety
• adverse events
• patient monitoring
• somatostatin analogues
• therapeutic efficacy

Declaration of interest

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Reviewer disclosures

Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Scientific accuracy review

Ipsen provided a scientific accuracy review at the request of the journal editor.

Additional information

Funding

This paper was not funded.