503
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Transgressing taboos: the relational dynamics of claim radicalization in Hong Kong and Thailand

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 802-821 | Received 16 Sep 2021, Accepted 09 Sep 2022, Published online: 25 Oct 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Claims made during mass protests in Hong Kong in 2019 and Thailand in 2020 became increasingly transgressive. Localist demands and calls for the reform of the monarchy, respectively, violated conventional political norms in these two hybrid regimes. This paper examines the dynamics of opposition discursive radicalization during ongoing autocratization. Observational data and protest event analysis are employed to assess the scaling up of claims-making and its relationship to protest size and group solidarity. The paper argues that radicalization can best be understood relationally, between a hybrid regime, on the one hand, and moderates and radicals in the opposition, on the other. It identifies the following three points of convergence that lead to similar protest trajectories in both cases: the marginalization of moderates along with their gatekeeping role of transgressive discourses; the creation of digitally enabled protest networks that facilitated mass mobilization and claims diffusion; and the intensification of protest policing that provoked a departure from reformist to revolutionary claims. The argument offered here shows similarities to but also nuanced differences from the repression literature and casts doubt on the assumptions about the demobilizing impact of autocratization.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This work is supported by grants from the Hong Kong Research Grants Council (Ref No. 11605820 and 11600921)

Notes on contributors

Mark R. Thompson

Mark R. Thompson is director of the Southeast Asia Research Centre, and professor of politics at the Department of Public and International Affairs, City University of Hong Kong. His research focues on autocracy, democracy, and national leadership in Northeast and Southeast Asia.

Edmund W. Cheng

Edmund W. Cheng is an associate professor in the Department of Public and International Affairs at the City University of Hong Kong. His research interests include contentious politics, political communication, international conflicts, and research methods.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 322.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.