![Sample our Behavioral Sciences journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/110801/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Behavioral-Sciences.jpg"})
Abstract
Interpretation is a specific technique, and it is one of the main components of psychodynamic psychotherapy’s processes. This systematic review aimed to investigate the effectiveness of different types of interpretation (e.g. regarding transference, dreams, and symptoms) for patients with various disorders. Also, it aimed to identify the moderators and mediators of the relationship between interpretation and some outcomes. We adopted the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines for systematic reviews. We selected nine RCTs and one quasi-experiment investigating the role of transference, dreams, and panic-symptoms interpretations. Studies were published between the years 1983 and 2016. The review showed that transference, dreams, and symptom interpretations predicted a positive outcome in most studies. Furthermore, for nearly all the analysed outcomes, psychodynamic psychotherapy using interpretations was superior to the control group (i.e. no treatment/wait-list). However, it was not superior to comparison groups (i.e. other types of psychotherapies) or to psychodynamic psychotherapy not using transference interpretations. Finally, patients’ and therapists’ characteristics and therapeutic relationship moderated/mediated the association between transference interpretations and outcomes. In conclusion, we suggest that interpretations are clinically helpful when therapists know how and when utilising them.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Notes
1. Høglend and colleagues’ RCT is called First Experimental Study of Transference Work (or FEST study). They have made further analysis on the same sample publishing eleven different articles from 2006 to 2020. These eleven publications are considered as one with the wording ‘Høglend et al. (Citation2006)’.