740
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Assessment of the loaded squat jump and countermovement jump exercises with a linear velocity transducer: which velocity variable provides the highest reliability?

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 247-260 | Received 11 Apr 2018, Accepted 18 Oct 2018, Published online: 15 Jan 2019
 

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to compare the between-session reliability of three typically measured velocity variables (mean velocity [MV], mean propulsive velocity [MPV], and maximum velocity [Vmax]) to assess vertical jump performance. Totally, 23 men had their squat jump (SJ) and countermovement jump (CMJ) tested against five different loading conditions (17, 30, 45, 60 and 75 kg) during two consecutive weeks. The two sessions of each jump type were performed within the same week separated by 48–72 h. The main finding was a significant difference in reliability between the variables, which were ranked from the highest to the lowest reliable as follows (median coefficient of variation [CV] and range): Vmax (CV = 2.35% [1.85%–3.23%]) >MV (CV = 3.29% [2.18%–4.40%]) >MPV (CV = 3.69% [2.08%–5.17%]). A significant variable × exercise interaction was also observed showing that the differences in reliability between the variables were meaningful during the SJ (MV: CV = 3.93% [3.06%–4.40%], MPV: CV = 4.61% [4.07%–5.17%], and Vmax: CV = 2.14% [1.85%–2.71%]), while no significant differences were observed for the CMJ (MV: CV = 2.43% [2.18%–3.70%], MPV: CV = 2.71% [2.08%–3.63%], and Vmax: CV = 2.40% [1.97%–3.23%]). These results suggest that the Vmax should be the recommended variable for obtaining a reproducible measure of lower-body ballistic performance, especially during the SJ exercise.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the participants who selflessly participated in the study. This study is part of a PhD Thesis conducted in the Biomedicine Doctoral Studies of the University of Granada, Spain.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This study was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport under a pre-doctoral grant (FPU15/03649) awarded to APC and by the University of Granada under a postdoctoral grant (perfeccionamiento de doctores) awarded to AGR.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 212.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.