Is ultrasound-guided suction curettage a reliable option for treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy? A cross-sectional retrospective study

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of our study is to present clinical courses and outcomes of 50 first-trimester cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) cases, which are managed either with transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS)-guided suction curettage alone or abdominal hysterotomy.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed our records from 2011 to 2016 at a single-center. TAUS-guided suction curettage alone was preferred in hemodynamically stable patients when the myometrial thickness was ≥3 mm and there was no vascular invasion. If the myometrial thickness was <3 mm and/or vascular invasion was present, then hysterotomy was preferred.

Results: Statistical analysis of age, gravidity, parity, history of previous CS (≥3 or <3), presence of embryonic cardiac activity, complaints (vaginal bleeding, pelvic pain, or both), preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin levels (g/dl), blood transfusion, initial serum β-hCG levels, and duration to resolution of β-hCG demonstrated no significant difference between TAUS-guided suction curettage and abdominal hysterotomy groups. There was a significant difference between two groups in terms of postoperative length of stay in the hospital and gestational age.

Conclusion: TAUS-guided suction curettage in selected cases may be considered as a reliable first-line treatment option due to its low cost, ease of application, lower side-effect profile, and potentially minimal influence on future fertility in CSP patients that are hemodynamically stable.

Keywords:

• Abdominal hysterectomy
• cesarean scar pregnancy
• ultrasound-guided dilation and curettage

Acknowledgements

The first author would like to thank Assoc. Prof. Dr. Seval Kul for her assistance in the statistical analysis of the manuscript.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.