Medical genetics and genomics training in obstetrics and gynecology residencies: are we ready for the future?

Abstract

Objective

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the availability and duration of formal medical genetics and genomics (MGG) education during obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) residency training in the United States compared to other noncore OB/GYN rotations.

Methods

We performed a review of rotation schedules published in all American Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited OB/GYN residency programs’ websites during the month of December 2016. Information regarding availability and duration of MGG rotation and other noncore OB/GYN rotations (ultrasound, breast health, and family planning) were collected.

Results

Among 256 ACGME-accredited OB/GYN residency programs, rotation schedule was available for 238 (93%). Only 34 programs (14.3%) had some form of MGG rotations. In the GLM, when compared to other noncore OB/GYN rotations, the mean duration of MGG rotation was significantly less than ultrasound (0.07 versus 0.57 months, p < .05) and family planning (0.07 versus 0.42 months, p < .05). The number of residents was the only variable significantly correlated with the availability of an MGG rotation (OR 1.07, 95%CI 1.02–1.13).

Conclusions

Despite the growing importance of MGG in day-to-day OB/GYN practice, only a limited number of ACGME-accredited OB/GYN residency programs offer an MGG rotation. When compared to other noncore OB/GYN rotations, such as, ultrasound and family planning, any MGG rotation was significantly shorter. With clear evidence that MGG will continue to radically change practice of OB/GYN in the future, it is imperative that steps need to be taken to address this deficiency in training.

Keywords:

• Genetics education
• genomics education
• residency training

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Anthony R. Gregg, MD, MBA and Marc R. Parrish, DO, MSBS for their insightful review and comments for the article.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.