383
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Comparison of sun exposure versus vitamin D supplementation for pregnant women with vitamin D deficiency

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1347-1352 | Received 12 Jun 2017, Accepted 14 Nov 2017, Published online: 28 Nov 2017
 

Abstract

Introduction: Maternal vitamin D deficiency is widespread health problem that is more important in pregnant women, which affects fetus growth and bone development. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of sun exposure versus vitamin D supplementation for pregnant women with vitamin D deficiency.

Materials and methods: This prospective clinical trial was performed on 87 pregnant women with vitamin D deficiency. Group A was treated with vitamin D 4000 IU per day for 10 weeks, while group B was recommended for sun exposure for 30 minutes daily (30% body surface area) for 10 weeks in summer and between 10 am–4 pm in direct sunlight. After the delivery, 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 levels were measured in the same previous center. Moreover, weight, height, and head circumference of fetus were measured at delivery in both groups and compared with each other.

Results: After 10-week intervention, 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 levels was significantly higher in group treated with vitamin D as compared to sun expose group (31.27 versus 19.79 ng/ml). (p < .001). However, height (p = .118), weight (p = .245), and head circumference (p = .681) of infants in both groups did not show significant differences.

Conclusions: Vitamin D supplementation is more effective than sun exposure in increasing 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 in pregnant women with vitamin D deficiency.

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the dedicated efforts of the investigators, the coordinators, the volunteer patients who participated in this study, the Clinical Research Development Units (CRDU) of Isfahan Alzahra hospital and Vali –Asr Reproductive Health Research Center of Tehran University of Medical Sciences.

Disclosure statement

The authors have indicated that they have no conflicts of interests regarding the content of this article.

Additional information

Funding

This study was financially supported by Isfahan University of Medical Sciences [grant no. 394132].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.