Comparison between presepsin and procalcitonin in early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis

Abstract

Background: Neonatal sepsis remains worldwide one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in both term and preterm infants. Lower mortality rates are related to timely diagnostic evaluation and prompt initiation of empiric antibiotic therapy. Blood culture, as gold standard examination for sepsis, has several limitations for early diagnosis, so that sepsis biomarkers could play an important role in this regard. This study was aimed to compare the value of the two biomarkers presepsin and procalcitonin in early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis.

Methods: This was a prospective cross-sectional study performed in Saiful Anwar General Hospital Malang, Indonesia, in 51 neonates that fulfill the criteria of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) with blood culture as diagnostic gold standard for sepsis.

Results: At reviewer operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses, using a presepsin cutoff of 706.5 pg/mL, the obtained area under the curve (AUCs) were sensitivity = 85.7%, specificity = 68.8%, positive predictive value = 85.7%, negative predictive value = 68.8%, positive likelihood ratio = 2.75, negative likelihood ratio = 0.21, and accuracy = 80.4%. On the other hand, with a procalcitonin cutoff value of 161.33 pg/mL the obtained AUCs showed: sensitivity = 68.6%, specificity = 62.5%, positive predictive value = 80%, negative predictive value = 47.6%, positive likelihood ratio = 1.83, the odds ratio negative = 0.5, and accuracy = 66.7%.

Conclusions: In early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis, compared with procalcitonin, presepsin seems to provide better early diagnostic value with consequent possible faster therapeutical decision making and possible positive impact on outcome of neonates.

Keywords:

• Biomarkers
• early diagnosis
• neonatal sepsis
• presepsin
• procalcitonin

Acknowledgements

This research was partially supported by Saiful Anwar General Hospital of Malang and PT. Dimensi Citra Semesta. The authors thank our colleagues from Neonatology Division of Pediatric Department who provided insight and expertise that greatly assisted the research.

Disclosure statement

The authors confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.