150
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Ultrasound predictors of candidates for segmental resection in pregnants with placenta accreta

ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, , , & show all
Pages 1004-1007 | Received 23 Jan 2018, Accepted 17 Aug 2018, Published online: 19 Sep 2018
 

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to assess the predictive values of individual sonographic findings of abnormal placentation to determine the candidates for segmental resection

Study design: This was a retrospective review of 43 pregnancies with at least one prior cesarean delivery who received an ultrasound diagnosis of placenta previa or low-lying placenta with suspected abnormal placentation in the third trimester at our institution from 2015 through 2017. Sonographic images were reviewed by an investigator blinded to pregnancy outcome. Sonographic parameters were assessed including loss of retroplacental clear zone, irregularity and width of uterine-bladder interface, smallest myometrial thickness, presence of lacunar spaces, and bridging vessels. Diagnosis of placental invasion was based on histologic confirmation. Parameters were analyzed to predict candidates for conservative approach.

Results: There were 27 cases with cesarean hysterectomy where as conservative approach was successful in 16 of the cases. Numbers of transfusions of packed red blood cells (2.6 vs. 1.7), fresh frozen plasma (2.3 vs. 0.9) and mean smallest retroplacental myometrial thickness (1.3 vs. 2.1 mm) were significantly different between the two groups (p < .05). Smallest retroplacental myometrial thickness was a significant predictor for the cases appropriate for successful conservative approach (Area Under Curve, AUC =0.911, p < .001), optimal cut off value was obtained at 1.6 mm with 94% sensitivity and 85% specificity.

Conclusions: Our data showed that among some sonographic findings of abnormal placentation, smallest myometrial thickness was a significant predictor to determine candidates for conservative approach.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.